Diese Vergnüglichkeit steht nun schon fast ein volles Jahr im WWW:
http://www.thescientificworld.com/TSW/toc/TSWJ_ArticleLanding.asp?jid=141&ArticleId=1623[*QUOTE*]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr.med.Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer
Posted 19th June 2007
Dear Dr. Søren Ventegodt: Your letter, for which I thank you, was indeed cordial but I am dismayed that either you have not understood anything concerning German New Medicine - or you pretend that you don't have a clue. In his expert opinion, Professor Niemitz calls traditional medicine an "amorphous hodgepodge of unproven hypotheses". Holistic Medicine is even more than that: namely an amorphous pudding mush of untold more unproven hypotheses which you want to see solidified. Holistic Medicine is a medicine in name only – it has no system at all. In contrast, German New Medicine is a Natural Science without a single hypothesis, and it is verifiable with astronomical exactitude with the next best available patient.
So, what does GNM have to do with this amorphous brew of Holistic Medicine such as Acupuncture, Siddha, Yoga, Aromatherapy, Tai-Chi, etc., or with the
homeopathy of Hahnemann who wanted to "cure" 95% of his patients in their healing phase with droplets and beads? Absolutely nothing!
In the 90's, his disciple Körbler stole my 2nd Biological Natural Law and sold it as "New Homeopathy", in such a way as to give the impression that Hahnemann (Khanemann) actually knew already about it.What you and your friends want to accomplish seems to come in three parts: 1. To hush up the issues of billions of worldwide victims and their responsible mass-murderers. 2. To purposely stir German New Medicine into the unscientific mush of holistic medicine. This way, everything which in GNM is so crystal clear becomes nebulous again, i.e. German New Medicine gets systematically diluted. Of course this is applicable only for non-Jews because, as I already mentioned, Jews have already been practicing pure German New Medicine for at least 23 years. 3. In your efforts to contest my copyrights you actually end up stealing German New Medicine for the Jews along the lines of: German New Medicine was a Jewish discovery. (continued below)
Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer
Posted 19th June 2007
(continued from above) You also rejoiced a little too early when you wrote in your paper: "Hamer is now 70 years old and his professional life finished." To this I can only say: You wait and see - others my age, and even older, managed to become Prime Minister or President. Maybe you and your friends really thought that I would not "survive" the concentration camp in France, or maybe you counted on me, or were even certain, that while jailed I would assign the exclusive rights to German New Medicine to judge Bessy (the highest rabbi in France) and his friends. But you don't know me. Not even 10 years in jail would have prompted me to commit such an act of treason. Just a single thought of the 1500 patients that are slain daily in Germany alone would have sufficed to prevent me from ever becoming such a traitor. Even when (fellow believer?) Robbi Schon revoked my license to practice Medicine 21 years ago, because of my "refusal to recant the New Medicine" and “to convert to traditional medicine", the administration in Frankfurt (Reg. Dir. Diefenbach) has recently confirmed to me in a personal conversation that this had been an injustice equivalent to administrative fraud. Nobody should have had the right to strip me of my license to practice Medicine without proof of the non-validity of German New Medicine. But now this license cannot be given back to me, notwithstanding the fraud, because it would constitute proof that traditional medicine is bogus. (continued below)
Dr. med. Mag.theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer
Posted 19th June 2007
(continued from above)Mr. Ventegodt, let's not pretend that German New Medicine has to be verified once more, maybe with the help of the indefinable holistic brew, despite the fact that such verifications have been conducted scientifically and officially some 30 times. Is it you or Prof. Merrick who would conduct this verification of German New Medicine, although you know nothing, and WANT TO KNOW NOTHING about GNM and the scientific verification criteria on the next arbitrary patient’s case? And then you advise me to document my success cases... Please - why not just simply acknowledge that German New Medicine is an exact science. It has no predecessors and functions just as exactly with patients who are dying (when they panic or get relapses) as it does with patients who survive. It simply always works and that applies to ALL 5 Biological Natural Laws. And when you write: “Other medical principles Hamer identified and called “medical laws” unfortunately lack the content and structure that is normally expected from medical science as they do not acknowledge and incorporate the established knowledge of immunology, toxicology, and other medical fields.” I never mentioned "medical laws". They don't even exist - there are only medical hypotheses. I only talk of Biological Natural Laws which do NOT exist in conventional medicine. And neither is there such a thing as medical science - except the scientific German New Medicine - or have you ever seen scientific knowledge regarding immunology - these are all just hypotheses. The name alone is an effrontery and feigns seriousness. If you expected to find with German New Medicine a scientific medicine that would acknowledge the established so-called "knowledge" of traditional medicine and would agree to be combined with the nonsensical hypotheses, then, similar to your holistic mish-mash, it would certainly not be a discovery. (continued below)
Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer
Posted 19th June 2007
(continued from above) So, let's drop the pretenses. Prof. Merrick and you, along with your fellow believers would not use German New Medicine since 23 years if it had proven to be incorrect. Don't underestimate the non-believers, they are not dumber than the Jews, even if they are good-natured and have a conscience for ALL of humanity. Dr. Ventegodt - no offense – but have you ever heard of truthfulness and honesty? Why don't you and Prof. Merrick have the courage to say: "Yes, German New Medicine is correct - we have been practicing it for 23 years and with a 98% cancer success rate. It is regrettable that we have to follow the Talmud and Rebbe Schneerson's directives to withhold German New Medicine from Non-Jews. We see our error and agree to make amends!" If you would give such honest testimonial for your religious community, then in the future practically nobody would have to die of cancer any more. With best regards, Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]
Im Weblog von Ventegodt, Merrick, Lees und Co. verlustiert sich der Ryke Geerd Hamer und wettert gegen die Homöopathen, insbesondere gegen Körbler:
[*QUOTE*]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
homeopathy of Hahnemann who wanted to "cure" 95% of his patients in their healing phase with droplets and beads? Absolutely nothing!
In the 90's, his disciple Körbler stole my 2nd Biological Natural Law and sold it as "New Homeopathy", in such a way as to give the impression that Hahnemann (Khanemann) actually knew already about it.----------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]
Also: "Wenn der Khan kräht auf dem Mist, ändert sich das Wetter oder es bleibt, wie es ist."
Da kann man ja froh sein, daß der Betrüger Hahnemann mit Vornamen Samuel heißt. Oder war das bloß ein Fake und in Wahrheit heißt er Dschingis?
In der Welt des Ryke Geerd Hamer ist so einiges ziemlich wirr.
So einiges, aber nicht alles! Daß Körbler sich den Namen Homöopathie beim altem Samuel Hahnemann "ausgeliehen" hat, um daraus ein eigenes Süppchen zu kochen, das ist wohl wahr. Wieso aber ausgerechnet Hamers Idiotie "2. Gesetz" unter dem Namen Homöopathie verkauft werden soll, ist ein Rätsel...
[*QUOTE*]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In the 90's, his disciple Körbler stole my 2nd Biological Natural Law and sold it as "New Homeopathy", in such a way as to give the impression that Hahnemann (Khanemann) actually knew already about it.----------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]
Was für intellektuelle Höchstbegabungen die Koniferen der Hamerschen Neuen Mördizin sind, sieht man auch in ihrem Forum. Da schreiben sie
http://www.gnm-forum.com/board/viewtopic.php?p=19317[*QUOTE*]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
Was hat also die „Germanische“ mit dem amorphen Brei der Holistic zu tun: wie Akupunktur, Ayurveda, Siddha, Yoga, Aromatherapie, Tai-Chi … etc. oder Homöopathie? Mit Hahnemann, der in 95% seiner Patientenfälle Heilungsphasen mit Tröpfchen und Kügelchen „heilen“ wollte. Einfach gar nichts!
Sein
Epigone Körner hat in den 90er Jahren mein 2. Biologisches Naturgesetz gestohlen und es als „Neue Homöopathie“ verkauft, so, als hätte eigentlich Hahnemann (Khanemann) das auch schon gewusst.
[...]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]
Da wird aus Körbler Körner und aus Schüler Epigone. Gleich zwei kapitale Fehler in einem Satz.
.