TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1

Advanced search  

News:

.
Saskatchewan research reveals controversial insecticides are toxic to songbirds

######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ########

Religion is hate. Hate must be stopped.
There is no excuse for indoctrinating hate.


######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ########
Warnung: Nazimethoden bei Twitter.
Alle Accounts in Gefahr!
Twitter ist dumm wie Schifferscheiße!

######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ######## ########


Pages: [1]

Author Topic: und wieviele Tote gehen auf das Konto von Caroline Markolin?  (Read 7817 times)

ama

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1086

Caroline Markolin wird fast immer in Verbindung mit dem Titel "Doktor" gebracht: "Dr. Caroline Markolin". Aber sie ist kein Arzt, sondern hat bloß Deutsch studiert.

http://germannewmedicine.ca/documents/markolin.html

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Caroline Markolin received her Ph.D. in German literature
from the University of Salzburg, Austria. After she moved
to Canada in 1987, she taught German Language and
Literature at Concordia University in Montreal. During her
academic career she published numerous books and essays
on contemporary Austrian literature. In 1998 she resigned
from her academic position as tenured Associate Professor
and began to pursue her strong interest in naturopathic
medicine. From 1999 – 2001 she gave workshops about the
benefit of nutritional supplements and herbs to naturopaths
in Germany and Austria.

It was during that time that she heard her first lecture about German New
Medicine®.
Captivated by this New Medicine that was based on holistic principles and
was at the same time an exact medical science applicable to each patients
case, she dedicated herself enthusiastically to study Dr. Hamers
revolutionary discoveries. After one year of intense studying of the
available research material, she met Dr. Hamer who has become her personal
tutor and mentor. Since 2002 Caroline is a full-time German New Medicine
teacher, who gives GNM presentations and GNM courses in Eastern and
Western Canada. If you wish to contact her, please go here.

Learning about GNM early is the ultimate preventive medicine
 
This site is in conformance with the
Copyright © by Dr. med. Ryke Geerd
Hamer, Amici di Dirk, Ediciones de la
Nueva Medicina.
If you wish to be put on our mailing list for updates of events, please click here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]



Caroline Markolin mit Ryke Geerd Hamer:



*http://germannewmedicine.ca/extimages/HamerCM.jpg
« Last Edit: May 11, 2007, 11:26:48 PM by ama »
Logged

ama

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1086
und wieviele Tote gehen auf das Konto von Caroline Markolin?
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2007, 11:55:13 PM »

Am 11.November 2004 belästigt Caroline Markolin den Präsidenten des deutschen PEN-Clubs, Johano Strasser:

http://germannewmedicine.ca/documents/penletter.html

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter to International PEN 11/11/2004
 
GERMAN NEW MEDICINE® ASSOCIATION - Canada
FOR THE PROMOTION OF THE SCIENTIFIC
DISCOVERIES OF DR. MED. RYKE GEERD HAMER


Dr. Caroline Markolin
President, German New Medicine® Association
1938 rue Perodeau
Vaudreuil-Dorion, QC
J7V 8P7 Canada
Tel and Fax: 001-450-424-3656
Website: http://www.germannewmedicine.ca


P.E.N.-Zentrum Deutschland, e.V.
Johano Strasser, Präsident
Kasinostraße 3
D-64293 Darmstadt
Germany11. November 2004


Sent via Email PEN-Germany@t-online.de and Fax: 011-49-6151-293414
(7 pages)

Re: Arrest and imprisonment of German citizen Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer

Severe violation of human rights, in particular the right of freedom of
expression and Dr. Hamers treatment in a French prison


cc:Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer
Amici di Dirk Spain
 Ing. Helmut Pilhar, Amici di Dirk Austria
Marco Pfister, Amici di Dirk Italy
Andree Sixt, Amici di Dirk France
German New Medicine Association, Germany
German New Medicine Association, Austria  
 Prof. Hans-Ulrich Niemitz, Advanced Institute of Technology, Economy
and Culture inLeipzig


Dear Mr. Strasser,

I am writing to you from Canada where I have been living as an
Austrian-Canadian for 18 years. As a former Associate Professor for German
literature at Concordia University in Montreal, I have always been
familiar with the International PEN and its excellent work.

Our letter to your organization and to you as president of the German
section of PEN is based on the Charter of the International PEN. According
to Article 4 "PEN stands for the principle of unhampered transmission of
thought within each nation and between all nations, and members pledge
themselves to oppose any form of suppression of freedom of expression in
the country and community to which they belong, as well as throughout the
world wherever this is possible." We understand that the German Section of
PEN feels committed to plead specifically for the rights of German
speaking writers, including non-fiction writers.

We are turning to you, in particular to PEN's "Writers-in Prison-Committee"
with a request to intervene on behalf of a German citizen, medical doctor
Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer. On September 9th, 2004 Dr. Hamer
was arrested in Spain and detained in a prison in Madrid for 6 weeks.
Following a European extradition order, Dr. Hamer was extradited to France
on October 18th. Presently, he is being held in the French prison
Fleury-Mérogis (Paris), sentenced to three years in prison without
probation.

Dr. Hamer's address:
No d` écrou 334 750 J
M.A. de Fleury-Mérogis
7 avenue des Peupliers
F-91705 Ste. Généviéve des Bois

The French court in Chambery (Savoy, France) accuses Dr. Hamer of "fraud
and complicity in the illegal practice of medicine". He has been charged
and found responsible for the deaths of French citizens due to the
availability of his publications in French.

Dr. Hamers scientific discoveries

Medical doctor Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer is the founder of the "Five
Biological Laws of the New Medicine". Since 2004 his scientific
discoveries are legally protected under the name "Germanische Neue
Medizin®" (German) and "German New Medicine®" (English).

Dr. Hamer's research began over twenty years ago after his son Dirk, while
sleeping on a boat anchored off the Mediterranean island of Cavallo, was
accidentally shot by the Italian Crown prince Victor Emanuele of Savoy.
Almost four months later, on December 7th, 1978, Dirk succumbed to those
injuries. Shortly after Dirk's death, Dr. Hamer was diagnosed with
testicular cancer. Since he had never been seriously ill, he hypothesized
that the development of his cancer could be directly related to the
unexpected loss of his son. At that time Dr. Hamer was head internist of a
cancer clinic at the University of Munich. It was there that he began to
systematically study his patients with regards to the causes, development
and healing process of their cancers. What he discovered was
revolutionary!

Dr. Hamer found, based on 200 case studies, that every disease originates
from a dramatic shock experience. He discovered that this shock affects
not only the psyche, but impacts simultaneously on the part of the brain
that corresponds biologically to the specific trauma (this impact is
clearly visible on a brain scan). Dr. Hamer established a clear and
systematic correlation between certain conflicts, how these conflicts
manifest themselves as what we term "diseases", and how all these
psychological and organic processes are connected to the brain as the
mediator between the brain and the body.

With his findings, Dr. Hamer was the first to prove scientifically that
cancer is not – as previously thought – a senseless proliferation of
deadly cancer cells but rather a meaningful (even predictable) biological
program created by Nature over the course of evolution in order to give
the individual (man and mammal alike) the chance to cope with a very
particular biological emergency situation (the unexpected "conflict
shock"). So far, Dr. Hamer has been able to confirm his discoveries with
over 40,000 case studies (more details list of Dr. Hamer's German
publications: http://www.neue-medizin.de/literatur.html)

For more than 20 years, Dr. Hamer's research has been providing us with
scientific evidence that cancer is NOT a life-threatening disease! Why,
one might ask, are these ingenious discoveries that could have saved
thousands of people from the current invasive treatments for cancer not
taught at a University level? In fact, in 1981, Dr. Hamer presented that
very research to the Medical Faculty of the University of Tübingen,
Germany, as a post-doctoral thesis. To this day, the Medical Faculty still
refuses, in spite of two court orders, to evaluate Dr. Hamer's findings
(more details below).

In 1986, Dr. Hamer was stripped of his medical license on the grounds that
he refused to renounce his findings on the origin of cancer. On September
9th, 1997 he was accused of "illegal practice of medicine" and sentenced
to 19 months in prison for having given three people free medical
information without a medical license. After his prison sentence in
Cologne (Germany), he moved to Spain where he has been living in exile
ever since.

On September 8th, 2004 (exactly 7 years after his first arrest), Dr. Hamer
was arrested again – this time on the grounds that some people in France
were informed about his research on cancer as well as about his
publications on the subject.

Details on Dr. Hamers arrest on 9-09-2004 and his extradition to France
on 18-10-2004

Dr. Hamers arrest on September 9th, 2004 is a result of rather dubious
appeal proceedings.
In January 2000, the French court in Chambery (Savoy, France) sentenced
Dr. Hamer in absentia to 18 months – 9 months in prison, 9 months on
probation - plus a financial penalty of about 7,000 Euro. The charges:
"fraud and the complicity in the illegal practice of medicine". According
to an AFP-press release (1-06-2004), several patients had been given
information about Dr. Hamer's findings on cancer by members of the
organization "Stop Cancer". After these patients died, Dr. Hamer was made
responsible for their deaths based on the publication of his scientific
research. It should be mentioned that Dr. Hamer had never spoken to any of
the individuals in person.

At the end of May 2004 something happened which is most likely
unprecedented in judicial history. The French Appeals Court held the
appeal hearing against Dr. Hamer without notifying him or his lawyer! Dr.
Hamer first learned about this hearing on May 27, 2004 when he received a
faxed copy of a newspaper article with the title "Hamer in Hiding" (Hamer
aux abonnés absent). The public prosecutorhad requested a long jail term
in order to obtain a European arrest warrant. The previous sentence had
been too short, because 9 months of the 18 were to be on probation. To
secure a European extradition warrant, a minimum penalty of 12 months
without probation was needed. The senior public prosecutor, Mme Jakobine
D., has requested the court to sentence Dr. Hamer to a "long enough
sentence to allow requesting a European arrest warrant", literally, "at
least one year in prison without probation". She has even appealed to the
European court to confirm in advance the minimum sentence of one year, to
be imposed when the time will come. Now the time has come!

On July 1st, 2004, the prison term was even increased. The court in
Chambery sentenced Dr. Hamer to 3 years in prison without probation for
"fraud and illegal practice of medicine". On top of that, Dr. Hamer was
ordered to pay compensation in the amount of Euro 200,000 to people he has
never seen and who supposedly suffered damages through his German New
Medicine or his publications.

The appeal proceedings and the sentence in absentia to three years in
prison which resulted in Dr. Hamer's arrest on September 9th, 2004 make it
obvious that the penalty is not based on the severity of the supposed
offense but rather of the feasibility to get a hold of him through a
pre-emptive European arrest warrant. The penalty in the first instance had
een clearly less.

An interview with Dr. Hamer's Spanish lawyer, published in the Spanish
paper "Discovery DSUDAD", contains revealing information. "Dr. Hamer's
Spanish lawyer, who, up to this point, had never met Dr. Hamer nor heard
of German New Medicine®, was surprised to learn the reason for the arrest
and the fact that a French court was able to issue a pre-emptive arrest
warrant while the verdict was still the subject of appeal proceedings. He
could not imagine somebody being detained under such circumstances in
Spain. Furthermore the lawyer deemed it unjust to sentence Dr. Hamer in
absentia despite a certificate attesting to Dr. Hamer's inability to
respect the hearing date because of illness and a request for a new date.
The lawyer also questioned the fact that the court refused a new hearing
date and sentenced Dr. Hamer in absentia, leaving him therefore without
legal protection. He also questioned why he wasn't arrested in the first
place to ensure his presence before court. He said that once appeal
proceedings were initiated, it would not be permitted to order pre-emptive
arrest proceedings with a view to a more favorable judgment. Furthermore,
the court was aware of Dr. Hamer's place of residence, nullifying the risk
of escape. According to the lawyer, the chain of events was rather
strange, completely unjustified and contrary to established proceedings."

Dr. Hamer's imprisonment in the context of the verification of his
discoveries

Dr. Hamer's findings have been verified over twenty times. Some
verifications were deposited with a notary.

Examples:

December 9th, 1988: University of Vienna, signed by:
Dr. Elisabeth M. Rozkydal, General Physician
Prof. Jörg Birkmayer, Specialist for Laboratory Medicine
Dr. Franz Reinisch, Specialist for Internal Medicine
Doktor Fritz Eberz, Intern

May 12/13, 1990: Verification at medical doctors conference in Namur
(Belgium), signed by 16 M.D.s

Juni 24th, 1992: Medical Faculty of the University of Düsseldorf, signed
by:
Prof. Dr. E. A. Stemmann, head doctor of pediatric clinic in
Gelsenkirchen, Germany
Dr. Elke Mühlpfort, pediatrician

September 8/9, 1998: Verification by the University of Trnavská
(Slovakia), signed by: Prof. MUDR. J. Pogády, DrSc, Professor of
psychiatry and Chair of the committee; Prof. MUDR; V. Krcmery, DrSc, Dean
of the Faculty; Doc. RN Dr. Josef Miklosko, DrSc, Pro-Rector of the
Faculty of Science.

With the "Verification of Trnava" we have a document, signed by ten
academic scholars, that clearly puts Dr. Hamer's findings on the origin,
development and healing of diseases on a publicly acknowledged level.
Since 1998 Dr. Hamer's discoveries have never been disproved, only
criticized as not being in accordance with the common view, i.e. with the
theories and hypotheses of standard medicine

Dr. Hamers published discoveries in the context of the European Convention
for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Art. 10.2 of the Convention states that the right to freedom of
information can be restricted by law for the sake of the protection of
health.

Given the numerous verifications of German New Medicine®, in particular
the verification by the University of Trnava, and by the many letters both
of patients and physician colleagues that document the ease of suffering
due to the application of Dr. Hamer's discoveries, it is unacceptable to
construe Dr. Hamer' publications as a "crime" rather than regard his
scientific work as a most valuable contribution to the "protection of
health".

In view of the German Superior Court verdict (BGH-IV ZR 135/92) that every
cancer therapy is in fact an experiment and that standard medicine is
unable to understand cancer on a scientific basis, the ongoing suppression
of German New Medicine®® and Dr. Hamer's imprisonment seems unfathomable.

Dr. Hamers imprisonment in relation to the role of the University of
Tübingen, Germany.

In October 1981, Dr. Hamer presented his findings of the "Five Biological
Laws of the New Medicine" to the Medical Faculty of the University of
Tübingen as a post-doctoral thesis. To this day, the Medical Faculty of
the University has refused to test Dr. Hamer's research in spite of its
legal obligation to do so and in opposition to a court order from the
administrative court Sigmaringen, Germany (AZ 3 K 1180/86; 17.10.1986).

On August 18, 2003, upon request of Dr. Hamer, Prof. Dr. Hans-Ulrich
Niemitz of the Advanced Institute of Technology, Economy and Culture of
Leipzig, Germany, wrote a scientific report entitled "The New Medicine a
New Natural Science". Professors Keuth (science theoretician) and Rassner
(medical doctor) both from the University of Tübingen wrote a response to
this report. In his "response to the response"-letter, dated March 18th,
2004 Prof. Niemitz quotes the following excerpts from the proceedings of
the administrative court in Sigmaringen:

"On December 16, 1986, Professor Voigt, Dean of the Medical Faculty of the
University of Tübingen was asked in court, whether Dr. Hamer could be
right with his "New Medicine".
Prof. Voigt affirmed this, adding: "Conventional medicine knows
practically nothing about cancer!" The Dean was also asked, if it is
correct what Dr. Hamer claims, that the New Medicine could be
scientifically reproduced and tested within just one or two days.
Prof. Voigt: "If in one, two or three days, I am not sure, but in
principle he is right!". Asked if he could remember that he had promised
Dr. Hamer back in 1981 that the New Medicine would be tested as to its
scientific accuracy, Prof. Voigt answered: "It is correct that I promised
that, however, the Medical Faculty rejected the evaluation of the thesis.
That is why I could not keep my promise!" The committee rejected his work
(150:0 votes with no abstention)!

"Judge Dr. Iber asked the Dean:
 
'Professor Voigt, you are saying that Dr. Hamer could be right and you
also admit that it would be possible to scientifically test the accuracy
of his findings within one to three days! But if his New Medicine is
correct, then you must approve it!"
 
Prof. Voigt: "Yes!".
 
Dr. Iber: "Now I am at a loss. Professor Voigt, you are saying that Dr.
Hamer could be right and that you could test that within a short period of
time. So why don't you test his findings?".
 
Prof. Voigt: "We don't want to know, whether Hamer is right!" ...
 
Dr. Iber: "What? You don't even want to find out, whether Dr. Hamer's "New
Medicine" is correct? This is a post-doctoral thesis. You are legally
obliged to test it!"
 
Prof. Voigt: "That is incorrect. We are only obliged to perform the
proceedings. We are not interested in whether Dr. Hamer is right!" ...
 
Dr. Iber: "In other words, you don't want to find out, although it would
be an easy procedure to do so and although you are bound by law to test
his findings and although it would have far-reaching consequences?"

Prof. Voigt: "No, we don't want to know. And I will always vote against
Dr. Hamer, no matter what he writes!"

Original: http://www.pilhar.com

As a result of both the University of Tübingens refusal to test Dr.
Hamer's scientific discoveries and the negligence of the Ministry of
Science of Baden-Württemberg to properly supervise the post-doctoral
thesis proceedings, Dr. Hamer was stripped of his medical license, was
imprisoned for 19 months in a German jail, was forced to live in exile in
Spain, and is now in prison in France. Dr. Hamer has been suffering
tremendously as a consequence of the government's misconduct. But not only
Dr. Hamer has been suffering. For more than two decades, every year
thousands of patients have been denied the chance to be treated according
to German New Medicine®® with its humane, non-invasive approach.

In October 2004, the German magazine "SPIEGEL" (Nr. 41) published a three
page article on Chemo "therapy" entitled "Giftkur ohne Nutzen" - Englisch:
"Toxic Treatment without Effect". The article reveals that Chemo has no
therapeutic effect at all but significantly worsens the quality of life.
The article also points out that often patients do NOT die of the cancer
but of the side effects of the "therapy".

Already back in 1989, Professor Dr. Abel from the Cancer Research
Institute in Heidelberg, Germany, confirmed in his publication
"Chemotherapies applied to Advanced Cancers" that 98% of the cancer
patients die within 5 years after the therapy. – Conversely, a cancer
treatment according to Dr. Hamer's findings offers a 92% chance of
survival! These statistics for German New Medicine®'s remarkable success
rate was delivered by a public prosecutor. When Dr. Hamer was arrested in
1997, the police searched his patients' files.
Subsequently, one public prosecutor was forced to admit during the trial
that, after five years, 6,000 out of 6,500 patients with mostly "terminal"
cancer were still alive.

It should also be mentioned that in spite of ten requests by Dr. Hamer's
lawyer, the court in Chambery also refuses to order the scientific
evaluation of the "Five Biological Laws of the New Medicine". In fact, the
court accepted UNAFDI, the state Anti-sect department as an accessory
prosecutor in the case. The objective is to publicly discredit Dr. Hamer
and portray him as a sect leader.
 
Dr. Hamers humiliating treatment in the French prison Fleury-Mérogis

In his letter dated October 21st, 2004 Dr. Hamer writes about his
treatment in prison:

"The last three days were an absolute horror. For 45 hours I was deprived
of sleep. Over and over again, I was searched and stripped of my clothes.
For two days I was forced to sleep on a cold tile floor with no blanket
and no mat. The whole day, all I got to eat was one sandwich and ½ liter
of water, and this only at 2pm. I was handcuffed just to walk the 20
meters to the toilet ... I feel like I am in a concentration camp. From
the beginning it was suggested that I should voluntarily undergo
psychiatric evaluation. The "crime" that I committed is now established:
"Illegal medical practice 'en general'", i.e. through my
publications."(http://www.pilhar.com/News/news.htm, translation).

Based on Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedom such treatment is illegal.

Dr. Hamer's letter also reveals that so far none of his family members had
been able to contact him. On the contrary, any contact with him was
deliberately blocked. According to a note, dated November 8th, 2004,
posted at, Dr. Hamer's son still had not gotten permission to contact his
father. As of today this situation has not changed!

A prior note from Dr. Hamer to his friends, dated October 10th, 2004, is
also disconcerting. He wrote: "Today I received the notification that I
will be extradited to France ... Already a week ago, one of my lawyers
told me, that should I be extradited – which is most likely the case due
to political pressure – he will ask the Spanish government to request from
the French authorities that I will not be tortured and not committed to a
psychiatric clinic … Obviously, torture is common practice in France."

According to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
torture is illegal. This applies also to France.


Let us summarize:

1) In Dr. Hamer's case the fundamental right to freedom of expression is
interpreted as a criminal act

2) It is considered a crime that an experienced medical doctor made his
"new" scientific discoveries, which (naturally) differ from the "old"
theories of standard medicine, available to the public. The fact that his
findings have been verified by several sources, including a University
committee, has been totally dismissed.

3) The ongoing refusal of the Medical Faculty of the University of
Tübingen to test Dr. Hamer's findings is directly connected to his present
incarceration in a French prison.
 
Mr. Strasser, we ask you in your position as president of the German
Section of the International PEN, to intervene on behalf of Dr. Hamer.
Please let us know as soon as possible (via email or fax) what we can do
on our part to support any of the "Writers-in-Prison Committees" actions
to plea for Dr. Hamer's immediate release.

For your information: Amnesty International has also been informed about
Dr. Hamer's situation.

Best regards,

signed, Dr. Caroline Markolin
President, German New Medicine® Association


P.S.: We reserve the right to publish this letter

 
For the response to this letter, please click here.

For a PDF file of this letter, please click here.


 
This site is in conformance with the
Copyright © by Dr. med. Ryke Geerd
Hamer, Amici di Dirk, Ediciones de la
Nueva Medicina.
If you wish to be put on our mailing list for updates of events, please click here.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]


Dieser Brief strotzt nur so vor Lügen.

Eine der dümmsten Lügen ist

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since 2004 his scientific discoveries are legally protected under the name
"Germanische Neue Medizin®" (German) and "German New Medicine®" (English).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]

Hamer kann höchstens die Wortkette "Germanische Neue Medizin" als Wortmarke schützen lassen.


Die Zahl der angeblichen Fallstudien durch Hamer wird immer und immer größer. Erst waren es 20.000, dann 30.000 und hier sogar 40.000:

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
So far, Dr. Hamer has been able to confirm his discoveries with
over 40,000 case studies (more details list of Dr. Hamer's German
publications: http://www.neue-medizin.de/literatur.html)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]

Sein großes Maul kann Hamers Erben zum fiskalischen Verhängnis werden: 10.000 Patienten seit der letzten Meldung vor wenigen Jahren...  Das macht 10.000 mal 200 Euro pro Fall, die Hamer jedesmal IM DURCHSCHNITT eingenommen hat. Macht 2 Millionen Euro. Das spanische Finanzamt wird sich freuen.


Auch dies ist eine schweinische Lüge:

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1986, Dr. Hamer was stripped of his medical license on the grounds that
he refused to renounce his findings on the origin of cancer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]

Die Wahrheit: Hamers "Klinik": Nachts wurden die Toten über die Grenze gebracht


Noch eine Lüge:

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Already back in 1989, Professor Dr. Abel from the Cancer Research
Institute in Heidelberg, Germany, confirmed in his publication
"Chemotherapies applied to Advanced Cancers" that 98% of the cancer
patients die within 5 years after the therapy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]

Prof. Abel hat so eine Aussage nie gemacht. Trotzdem wird er von Lügnern wie Ryke Geerd Hamer immer wieder falsch zitiert.

 
Caroline Markolin lügt über die 500 Toten bei Hamer in Burgau:

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsequently, one public prosecutor was forced to admit during the trial
that, after five years, 6,000 out of 6,500 patients with mostly "terminal"
cancer were still alive.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]

500 Tote sind 500 Tote. Dabei lügt Caroline Markolin (siehe oben):

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more than 20 years, Dr. Hamer's research has been providing us with
scientific evidence that cancer is NOT a life-threatening disease!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]

Die Wahrheit: Hamer ist ein Lügner, der sogar seine 500 Toten in Burgau wegwischt.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2007, 12:40:37 AM by ama »
Logged

ama

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1086
und wieviele Tote gehen auf das Konto von Caroline Markolin?
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2007, 01:13:24 AM »

Im Mai 2007 wird der folgende "Artikel" von Caroline Markolin in einem esoterischen Schundblatt veröffentlicht. Caroline Markolin stellt ein PDF davon auf ihre Website:

http://germannewmedicine.ca/documents/Explore%20GNM%20Website%20Update.pdf

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
GERMAN NEW MEDICINE® (GNM)
Dr. Hamer’s Medical Paradigm
© By Caroline Markolin, Ph.D., Vancouver, Canada

INTRODUCTION

On August 18, 1978, Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer, M.D., at the time head internist
in the oncology clinic at the University of Munich, Germany, received the
shocking news that his son Dirk had been shot. Dirk died in December 1978.
A few moths later, Dr. Hamer was diagnosed with testicular cancer. Since
he had never been seriously ill, he immediately surmised that his cancer
development might be directly related to the tragic loss of his son.
Dirk’s death and his own experience with cancer prompted Dr. Hamer to
investigate the personal history of his cancer patients. He quickly
learned that, like him, they all had gone through some exceptionally
stressful episode prior to developing cancer. The observation of a
mind-body connection was not really surprising. Numerous studies had
already shown that cancer and other diseases are often preceded by a
traumatic event. But Dr. Hamer took his research a momentous step further.
Pursuing the hypothesis that all bodily events are controlled from the
brain, he analyzed his patients’ brain scans and compared them with their
medical records. Dr. Hamer discovered that every disease—not only
cancer!—is controlled from its own specific area in the brain and linked
to a very particular, identifiable, "conflict shock". The result of his
research is a scientific chart that illustrates the biological
relationship between the psyche and the brain in correlation with the
organs and tissues of the entire human body (the English “Scientific Chart
of GNM” is in the works).

Dr. Hamer came to call his findings "The Five Biological Laws of the New
Medicine", because these biological laws, which are applicable to any
patient’s case, offer an entirely new understanding of the cause, the
development, and the natural healing process of diseases. (In response to
the growing number of misrepresentations of his discoveries and to
preserve the integrity and authenticity of his scientific work, Dr.
Hamer has now legally protected his research material under the name
German New Medicine® (GNM). The term "New Medicine" could not be
copyrighted internationally).

In 1981, Dr. Hamer presented his findings to the Medical Faculty of the
University of Tübingen as a post-doctoral thesis. But to this day, the
University has refused to test Dr. Hamer’s research in spite of its legal
obligation to do so. This is an unprecedented case in the history of
universities. Similarly, official medicine refuses to approve his
discoveries despite some 30 scientific verifications both by independent
physicians and by professional associations.

Shortly after Dr. Hamer submitted his thesis, he was given the ultimatum
to renounce his discoveries or have his contract renewal at the University
clinic denied. In 1986, even though his scientific work had never been
impeached, much less disproved, Dr. Hamer was stripped of his medical
license on the grounds that he refused to conform to the principles of
standard medicine. Yet he was determined to continue his work. By 1987 he
was able to extend his discoveries to practically every disease known to
medicine.

Dr. Hamer has been persecuted and harassed for over 25 years, in
particular by the German and French authorities. Since 1997, Dr. Hamer has
been living in exile in Spain, where he carries on with his research and
where he continues to fight for official recognition of his "New
Medicine". But as long as the University of Tübingen’s medical faculty
maintains its delay tactics, patients all over the world will be denied
the benefit of Dr. Hamer’s revolutionary discoveries.

THE ORIGIN OF DISEASE IN THE BRAIN

Dr. Hamer established that "every disease is caused by a conflict shock
that catches an individual completely off guard" (First Biological Law).
In honor of his son, Dr. Hamer called this unanticipated stressful event a
Dirk Hamer Syndrome or DHS. Psychologically speaking, a DHS is a very
personal incident conditioned by our past experiences, our
vulnerabilities, our individual perceptions, our values and beliefs. Yet,
a DHS is not a merely psychological but rather a biological conflict that
has to be understood in the context of our evolution.

Animals experience these biological shocks in concrete terms, for example,
through a sudden loss of the nest or territory, a loss of an offspring, a
separation from a mate or from the pack, an unexpected threat of
starvation, or a death-fright. Since over time the human mind acquired a
figurative way of thinking, we can experience these biological conflicts
also in a transposed sense. A male, for instance, can suffer a
"territorial loss conflict" when he unexpectedly loses his home or his
workplace; a female "nest conflict" may be a concern over the well-being
of a "nest member"; an "abandonment conflict" can be triggered by an
unforeseen divorce or by being rushed to the hospital; children often
suffer a "separation conflict" when Mom decides to go back to work or when
the parents split up.

By analyzing thousands of brain computer tomograms (CT) in relation to his
patient’s histories, Dr. Hamer discovered that the moment a DHS occurs,
the shock impacts a specific, pre-determined area in the brain, causing a
"lesion" that is visible on a CT scan as a set of sharp concentric rings
(In 1989, Siemens, the German CT scanner manufacturer, certified that
these ring formations are not artifacts of the equipment). Upon impact,
the affected brain cells communicate the shock to the corresponding organ,
which in turn responds with a particular— predictable!—alteration. The
reason why specific conflicts are indissolubly tied to specific brain
areas is that during our historical evolution, each part of the brain was
programmed to respond instantly to conflicts that could threaten our
survival. While the "old brain" (brain stem and cerebellum) is programmed
with basic survival issues that relate to breathing, eating, or
reproduction, the "new brain" (cerebrum) is encoded with more advanced
themes such as territorial conflicts, separation conflicts, identity
conflicts, and self-devaluation conflicts.

Dr. Hamer’s medical research is firmly tied to the science of embryology,
because whether the organ responds to a conflict by a tumor growth, by
tissue meltdown, or by functional impairment is determined by the
embryonic germ layer from which both the organ and corresponding brain
tissue originate (Third Biological Law).

GNM’s "Ontogenetic System of Tumors" illustrates that
"old-brain"-controlled organs, which derive from the endoderm or the
"old-brain"-mesoderm, like the lungs, liver, colon, prostate, uterus,
corium skin, pleura, peritoneum, pericardium, breast glands, etc., always
generate cell proliferation as soon as the corresponding conflict occurs.
Tumors of these organs therefore develop exclusively during the
conflict-active phase (initiated by the DHS).

Let’s take lung cancer, for example: The biological conflict linked to
lung cancer is a "death-fright conflict", because in biological terms the
death panic is equated with being unable to breathe. With the shock of the
death-fright the lung alveoli cells, which regulate breathing, instantly
start to multiply, forming a lung tumor. Contrary to the conventional
view, this multiplication of lung cells is not a pointless process but
serves a very definite biological purpose, namely, to increase the
capacity of the lungs and thereby optimize the organism’s chance of
survival. Dr. Hamer’s brain scan analyses demonstrate that every person
with lung cancer shows a distinct target ring configuration in the
corresponding area in the brain stem, and that each patient had suffered
an unexpected death panic prior to the onset of cancer. In the majority of
cases the death scare was triggered by a cancer diagnosis shock that the
person experienced as a "death sentence". Given that smoking is on the
decrease, this sheds new light on the enigmatic increase of lung cancer
("The #1 Killer") and calls into question whether smoking is per se an
actual cause of lung cancer.

Glandular breast cancer, according to Dr. Hamer’s findings, is the result
of either a "mother-child" or a "partner worry" conflict. These types of
conflict always impact the "old brain" in the area that controls the
milk-producing glands. A female can suffer a mother-child worry conflict
when her offspring is suddenly injured or seriously ill.

During the conflict-active stress phase, the breast gland cells
continually multiply, forming a tumor. The biological purpose of the cell
proliferation is to be able to provide more milk for the suffering
offspring and thus speed up healing. Every female human and mammal is born
with this age-old biological response program. Dr. Hamer’s many case
studies show that women, even when not breast feeding, developed a tumor
in the breast glands from obsessively worrying about the well-being of a
loved one (a child who is in trouble, a parent who is ill, or a dear
friend who is a cause for concern).

What has been said about lung cancer and breast cancer equally applies to
all other cancers that originate in the "old brain". Each is triggered by
a specific conflict shock that activates a "Meaningful Special Biological
Program" (Fifth Biological Law) which allows the organism to override
everyday functioning and deal physically with the emergency situation. For
each type of conflict there is a brain relay from where the particular
biological program is coordinated.

While "old-brain"-controlled organs generate a tumor growth during the
conflict-active phase, the opposite is the case with all organs that are
controlled from the cerebrum ("new brain"). Concerning the embryonic germ
layer, all cerebrum-directed organs and tissues (ovaries, testicles,
bones, lymph nodes, epidermis, lining of the cervix, bronchial tubes,
coronary vessels, milk ducts, etc.) originate from the ectoderm or the
"new-brain"-mesoderm. The moment the conflict occurs, the biologically
corresponding organ tissue responds with cell degeneration.

Necroses of the ovaries or testicles, osteoporosis, bone cancer, or
stomach ulcers, for example, are conditions that only occur while a person
is in a state of emotional distress in regards to the related conflict. As
is to be expected, the tissue loss has a biological significance.

Let’s take, for example, the tissue of the milk duct lining. Since the
squamous epithelial lining of the milk ducts developed at a much later
time than the milk-producing glands, this younger tissue is controlled
from a younger part of the brain, namely, the cerebral cortex. The
biological conflict of the milk duct lining is a "separation conflict"
experienced as if "my child [or my partner] was torn from my breast". A
female mammal can suffer such a conflict when her offspring is lost or
killed. As a natural reflex to the conflict the tissue of the milk duct
lining starts to ulcerate. The purpose of the tissue loss is to increase
the diameter of the ducts, because with enlarged ducts the milk that is no
longer used can drain off easier and doesn’t get congested in the breast.
Every woman’s brain is programmed with this biological response. Since the
female breast is, biologically speaking, synonymous with caring and
nurturing, women suffer such a conflict by unexpected separation from a
loved one they intensely care for. There are virtually no physical
symptoms during the conflict-active phase, except occasional light
"pulling" in the breast.

THE TWO-PHASE-PATTERN OF EVERY DISEASE

Dr. Hamer also discovered that, provided there is a resolution of the
conflict, every disease proceeds in two phases, (Second Biological Law).
During the first, or conflict-active phase, the entire organism is geared
to dealing with the conflict. While a meaningful cell alteration runs its
course on the physical level, the psyche and the vegetative autonomous
system also try to handle the unexpected situation. Switched into a stress
state (sympathicotonia), the mind becomes completely pre-occupied with the
conflict contents. Sleep disturbances and lack of appetite are typical
symptoms. Biologically speaking, this is vital, because the focus on the
conflict and the extra waking hours provide the right conditions for
working through the conflict and finding a resolution. The conflict-active
phase is also called the "cold phase". Since the blood vessels are
constricted during stress, typical symptoms of conflict activity are cold
extremities (particularly cold hands), the shivers, and cold sweats. The
intensity of the symptoms is naturally dependent on the magnitude of the
conflict.

If a person remains in an intense conflict-active state over a long period
of time, the condition can be fatal. But Dr. Hamer proves beyond
reasonable doubt that an organism can never die of cancer, in and of
itself. A person can die as a result of mechanical complications of a
tumor that, for example, occludes a vital organ such as the colon or the
bile ducts, but in no way can cancer cells, as such, cause death. In
German New Medicine the distinction between "malignant" and "benign"
cancers is entirely meaningless. The term "malignant" is an artificial
construct (the same applies to tumor markers) that simply indicates that
the activity of cell reproduction has exceeded a certain arbitrary limit.

If a person dies during the conflict-active phase, it is usually because
of energy loss, weight loss, sleep deprivation, and emotional and mental
exhaustion. Often, it is a devastating cancer diagnosis or a negative
prognosis—"You have six months to live!"—that throws cancer patients
(including their loved ones) into a state of despair. With little or no
hope, and deprived of their life-force, they waste away and eventually die
of cachexia, an agonizing process that conventional cancer treatments only
accelerate.

If the patient has not undergone any conventional treatment (especially
chemotherapy or radiotherapy), GNM has a success rate of 95 to 98 percent.
Ironically these statistics for Dr. Hamer’s remarkable success rate were
delivered by the authorities themselves. When Dr. Hamer was arrested in
1997 for having given three people medical advice without a medical
license, the police confiscated his patients’ files and had them analyzed.

Subsequently, one public prosecutor was forced to admit during the trial
that, after five years, 6,000 out of 6,500 patients with mostly "terminal"
cancer were still alive. With conventional treatment the figures are
generally just the reverse. According to epidemiologist and
biostatistician Dr. Ulrich Abel (Germany), "Success of most chemotherapies
is appalling ... There is no scientific evidence for its ability to extend
in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most
common organic cancer... Chemotherapy for malignancies too advanced
for surgery, which accounts for 80% of all cancers, is a scientific
wasteland." (Lancet 1991).

THE BODY HEALS ITSELF

The resolution of the conflict signals the beginning of the second phase
of the biological program. Our emotions and our organism switch
immediately into a healing mode assisted by the vegetative system’s switch
into "vagotonia". During the healing phase the appetite returns, but we
are very tired (we might not even be able to get out of bed). Rest and
supplying the organism with nutrients are essential while the body is
trying to heal. The second phase is also called the "warm phase", as
during vagotonia the blood vessels are enlarged, causing warm hands, warm
feet, and warm skin.

With the resolution of the conflict there is also an instant change at the
organ level. Cell proliferation ("old-brain"-controlled tumor growth) or
cell meltdown ("new-brain"-controlled tissue loss) immediately comes to a
halt, and the appropriate repair process is set in motion. An area that
necrotized or ulcerated during the conflict-active phase is now being
refilled and replenished with new cells. This is usually accompanied with
potentially painful swelling, caused by an edema that protects the tissue
while it is healing. Other typical repair symptoms are hypersensitivity,
itching, spasm (if muscle tissue is involved), and inflammation. Examples
of "diseases" that only occur in the healing phase are: certain skin
disorders, hemorrhoids, laryngitis, bronchitis, arthritis,
atherosclerosis, bladder or kidney disorders, certain liver diseases, and
infections (see below).

Based on the observation of cell multiplication (mitosis) and the standard
distinction between "benign" and "malignant" tumors, conventional medicine
interprets the natural cell production of healing tissues as a
"malignancy". In GNM we likewise distinguish two types of tumors. But the
tumors are not divided into "good" and "bad" ones; rather they are
classified according to their tissue type and the part of the brain from
which they originate and are controlled. There are those tumors which
develop exclusively during the conflict-active phase (lung tumor, colon
tumor, liver tumor, uterus tumor, prostate tumor, etc.) and, conversely,
those that result from the natural repair process. As with
"old-brain"-controlled cancers, the tumor growth is neither accidental nor
meaningless since the cell proliferation stops as soon as the tissue is
mended. Testicular cancer, ovarian cancer, lymphoma, non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoma, various types of sarcoma, bronchial and laryngeal carcinoma, and
cervical cancer are all of a curative nature and are exclusively phenomena
of the healing phase. Provided that the healing process is not interrupted
through medication or a conflict relapse, these tumors eventually degrade
during the completion of the healing phase.

The second type of breast cancer, the "ductal carcinoma in situ" (DCIS),
also falls into this category. While a glandular breast cancer is an
indication that a woman is in the active phase of a worry conflict, an
intra-ductal cancer is a positive sign that the related separation
conflict ("torn from my breast") has been resolved. A woman doesn’t
develop breast cancer without a reason! Neither does she develop breast
cancer by coincidence in precisely her right or left breast.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2007, 08:06:04 PM by ama »
Logged

ama

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1086
und wieviele Tote gehen auf das Konto von Caroline Markolin?
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2007, 01:39:36 AM »

THE BODY HEALS ITSELF

The resolution of the conflict signals the beginning of the second phase
of the biological program. Our emotions and our organism switch
immediately into a healing mode assisted by the vegetative system’s switch
into "vagotonia". During the healing phase the appetite returns, but we
are very tired (we might not even be able to get out of bed). Rest and
supplying the organism with nutrients are essential while the body is
trying to heal. The second phase is also called the "warm phase", as
during vagotonia the blood vessels are enlarged, causing warm hands, warm
feet, and warm skin.

With the resolution of the conflict there is also an instant change at the
organ level. Cell proliferation ("old-brain"-controlled tumor growth) or
cell meltdown ("new-brain"-controlled tissue loss) immediately comes to a
halt, and the appropriate repair process is set in motion. An area that
necrotized or ulcerated during the conflict-active phase is now being
refilled and replenished with new cells. This is usually accompanied with
potentially painful swelling, caused by an edema that protects the tissue
while it is healing. Other typical repair symptoms are hypersensitivity,
itching, spasm (if muscle tissue is involved), and inflammation. Examples
of "diseases" that only occur in the healing phase are: certain skin
disorders, hemorrhoids, laryngitis, bronchitis, arthritis,
atherosclerosis, bladder or kidney disorders, certain liver diseases, and
infections (see below).

Based on the observation of cell multiplication (mitosis) and the standard
distinction between "benign" and "malignant" tumors, conventional medicine
interprets the natural cell production of healing tissues as a
"malignancy". In GNM we likewise distinguish two types of tumors. But the
tumors are not divided into "good" and "bad" ones; rather they are
classified according to their tissue type and the part of the brain from
which they originate and are controlled. There are those tumors which
develop exclusively during the conflict-active phase (lung tumor, colon
tumor, liver tumor, uterus tumor, prostate tumor, etc.) and, conversely,
those that result from the natural repair process. As with
"old-brain"-controlled cancers, the tumor growth is neither accidental nor
meaningless since the cell proliferation stops as soon as the tissue is
mended. Testicular cancer, ovarian cancer, lymphoma, non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoma, various types of sarcoma, bronchial and laryngeal carcinoma, and
cervical cancer are all of a curative nature and are exclusively phenomena
of the healing phase. Provided that the healing process is not interrupted
through medication or a conflict relapse, these tumors eventually degrade
during the completion of the healing phase.

The second type of breast cancer, the "ductal carcinoma in situ" (DCIS),
also falls into this category. While a glandular breast cancer is an
indication that a woman is in the active phase of a worry conflict, an
intra-ductal cancer is a positive sign that the related separation
conflict ("torn from my breast") has been resolved. A woman doesn’t
develop breast cancer without a reason! Neither does she develop breast
cancer by coincidence in precisely her right or left breast.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF OUR BIOLOGICAL LATERALITY

Dr. Hamer found that our laterality determines whether a disease, like
cancer, develops on the right or left side of the body. This is the rule:
a right-handed person responds to a conflict with his/her mother or
children with the left side of the body, but responds to a conflict that
relates to a "partner", e.g., father, sibling, relative, friend,
colleague, etc., with the right side. For left-handers it is the reverse.
There is always a crossover relation from the brain to the body, because
each hemisphere of the brain (excluding the brain stem) directs the
opposite side of the body.

The simplest way to identify our biological laterality is the
clapping-test. The hand on top is the leading hand and indicates whether
we are right-handed or left-handed. Thus, a breast cancer in the right
breast, an ovarian cyst on the left ovary, a skin disorder on the right or
left side (or both), a motor paralysis on the left side (e.g., after a
stroke), give us a first indication "who" was involved when the original
conflict took place. Concerning more advanced conflicts (and brain
regions), the hormone status also has to be taken into account for an
accurate assessment.

THE BENEFICIAL ROLE OF MICROBES

Another aspect of Dr. Hamer’s research has been the role of microbes
during disease development. This, in brief, is what he found (Fourth
Biological Law): Microbes such as fungi, bacteria, and viruses are only
active during the healing phase, and the manner in which they operate is
fully in accordance with evolutionary logic. Tubercular bacteria, for
example, populate only "old-brain"-controlled tissues. Their function
during the repair phase is to decompose tumors that are now superfluous,
e.g., lung tumors, colon tumors, kidney tumors, prostate tumors, uterus
tumors, breast gland tumors, melanomas, and mesothelioma. Tubercular
bacteria are essential for breaking down the buildup of "disposable cells"
that proliferated for a biological reason during the conflict-active
phase. If the required bacteria are not available, due to vaccination,
overuse of antibiotics, or chemotherapy treatment, the tumor cannot
disintegrate properly. As a result, it stays in place and encapsulates
harmlessly.

Detected in a routine check-up, however, such an encapsulated growth can
lead to a "cancer" diagnosis and, potentially, new conflict shocks with
new symptoms. By understanding the biological laws of disease development
this prospect can be virtually eliminated.

While bacteria break down tumor cells that are no longer needed, viruses
appear to be involved in the healing process
of—exclusively—cerebral-cortex-controlled tissues (e.g., bronchia, nasal
membrane, stomach lining, lining of the bile ducts, and epidermis).

Hepatitis, pneumonia, herpes, influenza, and stomach flu, are indications
that a "virulent" but natural healing process is running its course.
Concerning the role of viruses, Dr. Hamer prefers to speak of
"hypothetical viruses" since lately the existence of viruses is called
into question. This would be in line with Dr. Hamer’s earlier findings
that the reconstruction and restoration process of ulcerated or necrotized
tissue still occurs, even if the tissue-related viruses are not present.

The dilemma in which conventional medicine finds itself is that by failing
to recognize the two-phase pattern of every disease, the first,
conflict-active phase, routinely gets overlooked. Since microbes are only
active during the healing phase, and since the activity of microbes is
typically accompanied by swelling, fever, pus, discharge, and pain,
microbes are considered malevolent and the cause of infectious diseases.
But microbes do not cause the disease. After all, it is our organism that
employs the microbes to optimize the healing process. Microbes can, of
course, be transmitted, but they remain dormant until the person is in the
healing phase of the same type of conflict.

QUESTIONING METASTASIS

Based on GNM’s "Ontogenetic System of Tumors", the widely propagated
theory of metastasis that suggests that cancer cells travel through the
blood or lymph vessels and cause cancers at new sites is, in Dr. Hamer’s
words, “pure academic fiction". Cells in general and cancer cells in
particular can under no circumstances change their histological structure
or cross the germ layer threshold. For example, a lung tumor cell, which
is of endodermal origin, controlled from the brain stem ("old brain"), and
which proliferates during the conflict-active phase cannot transform
itself into a bone cell, which is of mesodermal origin, controlled from
the cerebrum ("new brain"), and which deteriorates during a
conflict-active decalcification process. In the scenario "lung cancer
metastasizes into the bones", the lung cancer cells would actually be
creating a hole (i.e., cell meltdown!—the reverse of a cancer) in some
bone in the body. We also have to ask ourselves why cancer cells rarely
"spread" to the closest neighboring tissue, e.g., from the uterus to the
cervix. If cancer cells travel via the blood stream, why is donated blood
not screened for cancer cells? Why are there not multitudinous tumors
found in the walls of the blood vessels of cancer patients?

Two years ago, on August 19, 2004, the Canadian newspaper Globe and Mail
published an article entitled, "Researchers Chase Breast-Cancer Blood
Test", containing the revealing statements, "The hunt for tumour cells
in the blood stream has taken 10 years... ",and, "until recently no
technology existed to reliably pluck out the odd tumor cell from the
millions of red and white blood cells contained in a single vial of human
blood." Besides the fact that the "chase" is far from over (as the article
indicates), doesn’t this imply that the "metastasis" hypothesis was
misinforming the public and was scaring millions of cancer patients to
death for over four decades?

Dr. Hamer does not, of course, dispute the fact of second cancers, but
these subsequent tumors are not caused by migrating cancer cells that
miraculously transform into a different cell type, but rather by new
conflict shocks.

New DHSs can be initiated by additional traumatic life experiences or
through diagnosis shocks. As already mentioned, an unexpected diagnosis of
cancer, or being told that it is "metastasizing" can trigger a
death-fright (causing lung cancer) or any other type of diagnosis-related
shock, causing new cancers in other parts of the body. In many cases these
patients don’t make it into the healing phase, because the severe state of
stress weakens them to a point where they have very little chance of
surviving the highly toxic chemotherapy treatment.

The second most frequent cancer after lung cancer is bone cancer. Dr.
Hamer found that our bones are biologically linked to our self-esteem and
our self-worth. Thus, being told one has a "life-threatening illness",
especially one that allegedly "spreads like wildfire" through the body, is
equated with: "now I am useless", and the bone(s), next to where we feel
"useless" start to decalcify (in the case of breast cancer often in the
area of the sternum or the ribs). Just as with a fractured bone, the
purpose of the biological program (of the "disease") appears at the end of
the healing phase. When the repair phase is completed, the bone will be
much stronger at that site, thus assuring that we are better equipped for
the eventuality of a new "self-devaluation conflict".

THE NATURE OF BRAIN TUMORS

Once the conflict has been resolved, the brain lesion—along with the
psyche and the organ—also enters the healing phase. As with any wound that
is being repaired, an edema (excess fluid) develops to provide protection
of the recovering neural tissue. On the brain scan the changes are clearly
noticeable: the sharp target rings submerge in the edema and appear now as
blurry, indistinct and dark.

At the height of the healing phase, when the brain edema has reached its
maximum size, the brain triggers a brief, strong push that expels the
edema. In GNM terminology, this counter regulation is called the
"Epileptoid Crisis" (EC). During this crisis, the entire organism is
thrust briefly into a state of sympathicotonia, i.e., re-living the
typical symptoms of the conflict-active phase such as cold sweats, cold
extremities, a fast heartbeat, and nausea. The intensity and duration of
this pre-programmed crisis is determined by the intensity and the duration
of the preceding conflict. Heart attacks, strokes, asthma attacks, and
epileptic seizures are just a few examples of this crucial turning point.
The type of "crisis" always depends on the nature of the conflict and the
precise brain area involved.

After the brain edema has been pressed out, neuroglia, which is brain
connective tissue that provides structural support for neurons, assembles
at the site to restore the function of the nerve cells that were affected
by the conflict shock (DHS). It is this natural glia accumulation that
conventional medicine labels as a "brain tumor", with often dire
consequences for the patient. Dr. Hamer established already in 1981 that a
"brain tumor" is not a disease in itself, but symptomatic of a healing
phase that runs parallel in the organ (controlled from the correlated area
of the brain that is simultaneously undergoing the repair phase).
“Metastatic brain cancers", therefore, do not exist either.

GNM THERAPY (in a nutshell)

The very first step in GNM therapy is to provide an understanding of the
biological nature of a symptom, e.g., a certain cancer, in relation to its
psychical cause. A brain scan and a thorough medical history are vital to
determine whether the patient is still conflict-active or is already
healing. If still in the active phase, the focus is to identify the
original DHS and to develop a strategy to resolve the conflict. It is
crucial to prepare the patient for the healing symptoms and for potential
complications. These symptoms are very predictable! Dr. Hamer’s findings
provide us—for first time in the history of medicine—with a reliable
system that allows us not only to understand but also to predict the
development and symptoms of each and every disease. This is real
preventive medicine, an aspect of German New Medicine which can hardly be
emphasized enough. True prevention requires an understanding of the real
cause of a disease, and that is what Dr. Hamer’s research supplies in
splendid detail.

By understanding the "Five Biological Laws" of the cause and healing
process of disease we can free ourselves from the fear and panic that
often come with the onset of symptoms. This knowledge is more than power,
it can save lives.


About the Author
Caroline Markolin, Ph.D., is a full-time German New Medicine® teacher,
trained and approved by Dr. Hamer. She is living in Canada and offers GNM
weekend seminars on a regular basis in Montreal and Vancouver.


For more information about GNM visit http://germannewmedicine.ca.

This article was first published in: EXPLORE! Vol. 6 /Nr. 3 - May 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]




Das sind die üblichen Lügen. Siehe oben.

Interessant ist der Zeitpunkt: JETZT, Mai 2007.

Nach wie vor lügt Caroline Markolin wie gedruckt.

Seit Jahren führt Caroline Markolin Kranke in den Tod.

Seit Jahren lebt Caroline Markolin davon.

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
About the Author
Caroline Markolin, Ph.D., is a full-time German New Medicine® teacher,
trained and approved by Dr. Hamer. She is living in Canada and offers GNM
weekend seminars on a regular basis in Montreal and Vancouver.

For more information about GNM visit http://germannewmedicine.ca.

This article was first published in: EXPLORE! Vol. 6 /Nr. 3 - May 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]

Ich nenne so etwas Mord.

.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2007, 01:46:46 AM by ama »
Logged

ama

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1086
Ist die Caroline Markolin obendrein eine Hochstaplerin und Fälscherin?
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2014, 09:51:11 PM »

Ist die Caroline Markolin obendrein eine Hochstaplerin und Fälscherin? Die Buschtrommel flüstert mir leise in Notebook, daß die Markolin von Ryke Geerd Hamer abgewatscht wurde. Die Ilsedora Laker, die verantwortlich ist für den Tod von Christina Connell

http://www.ariplex.com/ama/amachris.htm

spielt sich als Ober-Hamerin auf. So lange schon gehört auch sie hinter Gitter.


http://healthtriads.com/authorized-teachers-of-gnm/

[*QUOTE*]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Welcome to Your Journey on the Road to Health!
Two Triads of Health incorporates known alternative therapies that ease symptoms while the body is healing according to the Five Biological Laws.

Authorized Teachers of GNM

STATEMENT FROM DR. HAMER

This is the latest update from Ilsedora Laker regarding statement from Dr. Hamer on June 12, 2013.

In recent discussions with Dr. Hamer it has come to our attention that Caroline Markolin has decided to become the voice of Dr. Hamer without his knowledge or permission. This self – imposed authority has resulted in vicious, uncalled for attacks against the owner of this web site, Ilsedora Laker.

Caroline Markolin has as a result also committed an act of fraud in this process by cutting and pasting Dr. Hamer’s signature to a document she claims was written by Dr. Hamer. This forged document is a warning to the public against Ilsedora Laker as a teacher of the GNM. This is not the first time Markolin has attacked Ilsedora Laker. Her relentless attempts to discredit Ilsedora Laker end even fraudulently using Dr. Hamer’s signature lead one to believe that Caroline Markolin is no longer in control of her better judgement. This document is visible on her web site and is labeled as “warning” as if to say she has the power to create public awareness against Ilsedora Laker.

In the recent past she has authorized first time students with little knowledge to claim that they have the expertise to teach the GNM. At the same time she has given others permission to use Dr. Hamer’s copyrighted material in their presentations. This was done without Dr. Hamer’s knowledge or permission.

The only person qualified to give permission to teach the GNM and use his copyrighted “intellectual property” on any level is Dr. Hamer.

Dr. Hamer has mentioned to us that the videos Caroline Markolin has posted on Youtube are not approved by him.

He finds them offensive to the GNM. He has also asked Caroline Markolin to remove this series of lectures from the Internet because he finds them to be a poor representation of his work. Unfortunately she has refused to comply.

The only approved presentations outlining the GNM are the presentations given by Ilsedora Laker which are now available on DVD through this web site.

Caroline Markolin claims to be the GNM “authority” equal to Dr. Hamer. Dr. Hamer has never given her any kind of authority. Caroline Markolin, according to Dr. Hamer and his seminar attendance records, has taken two weeks of seminar with him and yet she presents a “certificate of attendance” as proof of her GNM knowledge and teaching expertise as if it gave her the permission from Dr. Hamer to exclusively give lectures and seminars in the English speaking world.

Caroline Markolin does not have the body of knowledge or as Dr. Hamer says “a single day of clinical experience” to be able to call herself an expert in the GNM. It is for that reason that we at this website, which was originally established in 2001 by request of Dr. Hamer, have been asked to make this statement. Dr. Hamer recently mentioned to Ilsedora Laker that Caroline Markolin led him to believe that she was a PhD of biology when in fact her subject is German Literature. She does not have an official science background.

Dr. Hamer has established the University of Sandefjord in order to officially teach the GNM at a certification level. The curriculum is in progress and until it is fully established, those teaching the GNM require his express permission to do so. Ilsedora Laker, at this time, is the only person in the English speaking world that has his permission to teach the GNM. Dr. Douglas Price teaches the GNM under Ilsedora Laker’s guidance and supervision by permission of Dr. Hamer.

To be able to teach the principles of the GNM on an effective level takes a considerable amount of knowledge, experience and expertise.

There are many people in the English speaking world, European and Spanish community that claim to have this expertise and offer certification in GNM as both teachers and therapist’s, however they have no training and are not authorized by Dr. Hamer to do so. Caroline Markolin is one of those people.

It is also important for the general public to know that Caroline Markolin has NOT had direct communication with Dr. Hamer in several years. Ilsedora Laker on the other hand speaks with Dr. Hamer weekly on GNM matters.



Important statement from Dr. Hamer.

The only approved presentations outlining the GNM are the presentations given by Ilsedora Laker, my colleague at www.newmedicine.ca which are now available on DVD through this web site.  I, Dr. Douglas J. Price present her presentations for the Pacific Rim (Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia, India, Japan and other provinces in these time zone regions).

This is from Ilsedora Laker on the latest update that will be on going from April 5, 2013.

April 5, 2013

Dear Friends;

It has come to my attention that Caroline Markolin has publicly attacked me by writing an open letter which was posted on her web site.

Ms. Markolin has recently received notification from Dr. Hamer to stop misrepresenting herself as the only credible source of GNM teaching in the English speaking world.
Hence her personal attack on me.

She presents a certificate of attendance of participating in seminars with Dr. Hamer as a document which suggests that it qualifies her to be the only person capable of teaching the GNM.

I challenge anyone to call or e-mail Dr. Hamer’s office and ask that question. The obvious answer would be that she is in fact NOT qualified and is NOT held in high esteem by Dr. Hamer.

Having been acquainted with Ms. Markolin since she first entered the picture in 2002 when she took one of my introductory seminars in Ottawa, I quickly realized that this person was someone that I did not wish to associate with and I chose to distance myself from her.

After taking the initial seminar with me, she went to Spain and began taking seminars with Dr. Hamer.
To my surprise, after her first seminar with him, his assistant sent the “certificate of participation” to me to forward to Ms. Markolin with a note stating that they do not normally give certificates because
ultimately they are meaningless.

Some months later when she started her web site and posted this
certificate, I spoke with Dr. Hamer and he made a point of saying that this does not qualify her as a teacher by any means because thousands of people have taken his seminars over the years. This also does not mean that they understand the GNM.
He then said “Ilsedora, if you want a certificate, I will be happy to send you one”. This of course puts it into perspective. Naturally I thanked him but declined.

Many years ago, a woman from Australia e-mailed me requesting help with a very large breast tumor.
For obvious reasons it is unethical to give any advice, especially through e-mail. This person, out of fear, did not want any kind of intervention and was looking for someone to agree with her.

When a massive breast tumor develops, conventional medicine will first give chemo therapy and radiation before they would even consider surgery. In her case, that is what was offered to her.

My response to her was that she had little choice, if you do nothing the tumor could visibly decompose in front of her eyes. This can occur in some cases. Markolin does not seem to be bothered by this and will encourage women to do this based on how she understands the GNM.
In my experience in alternative medicine, I have observed breast cancer patients make the choice, out of fear to “do nothing” and have died as a result of that fear. I feel it is an obligation to make sure the patient understands everything she may be facing and what her options are. Personally I am not in a legal position to give advice about treatment. People don’t seem to understand that, and strangely Ms. Markolin is trying to use that against me.

Contrary to what Ms. Markolin has interpreted from her seminars with Dr. Hamer, this is not what he says with respect to breast cancer. He has in fact written a book on breast cancer where he shows explicit photos of what can happen.

Markolin’s lack of experience in this matter and her willingness to encourage a patient to do nothing could be interpreted as negligence.

What Ms. Markolin fails to realize is that once the ordinary person has a diagnosis, this qualifies as a shock in the majority of the cases and if the patient does not feel safe or confident the disease can spread as a result.

In some cases, the tumor can spontaneously disappear.  I have observed this and I have personally experienced this. However this is not the rule and we must be careful not to put all women into the same category. It is the individual’s psyche that will determine what the cancer will do.

Knowing the GNM after the diagnosis is not always the solution. The “die has been cast” so to speak. In other words, the patient has experienced another shock and if it is left to “fester” they can fail to recover especially if they have no guarantee or confidence in conventional or alternative medicine.

So my question to Ms. Markolin is “where does she, with absolutely NO clinical experience have the audacity to expect anyone to give advice via e-mail to do nothing? This goes against the principles of the GNM, especially since Dr. Hamer prides himself on having accurate clinical information to be able to assess someone under the Five Biological Laws.

What she forgets is that Dr. Hamer does not say “do nothing” he says “do the right thing”.
When this Australian woman forwarded my response to Ms. Markolin, she immediately sent it to Dr. Hamer to “try to discredit me in his eyes”.

Shortly after this, Dr. Hamer said to me “Ilsedora I hear that you support chemotherapy”. Needless to say I knew immediately the origin of his comment. I realized through this particular incident that I had been “set up” by Markolin. Naturally after our discussion he understood my reply to this unfortunate woman.

Over the years, Ms. Markolin has continuously tried to discredit me in Dr. Hamer’s eyes and as you can see from this last letter she has posted, she has made it a point to save that particular e-mail she sent to Dr. Hamer. Since the e-mail she refers to is dated 2008, does this not suggest that her actions are premeditated?
She has publicly tried to discredit me in her seminars as well by making derogatory comments.

What kind of person would so such a thing especially having knowledge of the GNM and what the work stands for?

The findings of Dr. Hamer, on a much higher level, imply that once we are acquainted with these universal Biological Laws, as intelligent people with a “soul”, we should be practicing a life of harmlessness, not continuously and consciously try to inflict shocks on others.

It is unfathomable to me why someone would save something for many years that had already been addressed, and “lie in wait” for an opportunity to use it publicly unless they have their own agenda and have had plans to do something like this for a very long time.

More recently Ms. Markolin has taken liberties with respect to her “self imposed authority” and Dr. Hamer has recently also addressed these issues with her.

Needless to say, she has chosen to try to discredit me in the process. Her status in the eyes of Dr. Hamer has diminished considerably and I feel this is her way of retaliating.

She has tried many times over the years to “take out the competition”.

Some years ago, one of her former cohorts came to me with some very disturbing information with respect to her “plans” for Ilsedora Laker. He urged me to watch my back because Ms. Markolin said in front of her inner group that she would make sure that “Ilsedora will be out of the picture soon”.

So, dear readers and supporters of the GNM, make of it what you will of this “tempest in a teapot”. My approach, until this blatant and uncalled for attack on my person and GNM qualifications as a teacher and therapist have always been to take the high road. However this attack is so
underhanded that I have been forced into a position to openly disclose everything that has gone on behind the scenes in my own defence.
I am only addressing two points in this statement because the other issues Ms. Markolin refers to are so ridiculous that they do not even qualify a response.

With respect to the statement on the home page of my web site, Dr. Hamer asked me to post it last December. This is not something I would initiate myself.

The post was a warning by Dr. Hamer to the unsuspecting masses, and now Markolin has proven herself to be openly vindictive and self serving in the process.

Over the last few months I have had hundreds of e-mails from people with respect to who is qualified to teach and who is not qualified in the GNM world.

One of the most disturbing reasons is that it came to light from credible sources that Caroline Markolin has given “her authorization” to tell people to teach the GNM even after one introductory seminar with her!

These people and others were also given permission to use Dr. Hamer’s copyrighted diagrams by her as long as they include that it was
copyrighted by him!

It has also come to light that some people associated with her are misrepresenting themselves as the “successors” to Dr. Hamer in the Spanish speaking community even though they had not even met him, or taken a course with him!

There are other issues that Dr. Hamer has been addressing with her at this time, Issues that are directly related to her overstepping her boundaries and sacrificing the integrity of the GNM in the process.

Dr. Hamer told me recently that he has not had any personal contact or conversations with her in several years. Yet she made claims that she was working on a “mega GNM project with Dr. Hamer” on her web site 18 months ago. This is an outright lie. Dr. Hamer is NOT working with Ms. Markolin on any GNM project!

He was so displeased with her Youtube presentations that he requested she remove them from the internet. She refused to comply.

As you know Dr. Hamer has established the University of Sandefjord in order to establish credible guidelines for the GNM. The curriculum is not running as yet. However, just this week, we found reference to Caroline Markolin sanctioning the opening of a school of GNM with clinic in Barbados! All this without Dr. Hamer’s knowledge!

Given the fact that she has no clinical experience and only a very basic knowledge of the GNM, Dr. Hamer cannot support such an enterprise. Only he is qualified to teach at the high level of expertise that is required to undertake such a project which requires a vast body of medical knowledge and clinical experience. Caroline Markolin and her students certainly do not have these qualifications.

It’s obvious to me that she is trying to discredit me because her true intentions have been exposed to Dr. Hamer and this only reaffirms why I distanced myself from her in the very beginning.

Perhaps her personal attack on me has only served to expose herself for who she truly is? After all the document she has posted certainly shows that her actions were premeditated.

An official statement from Dr. Hamer’s office is pending.

Ilsedora Laker
-------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]



Pages: [1]