TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1

Advanced search  

News:



We are Allaxys
We moved our news front to http://www.allaxys.com

The Forum 1 on Transgallaxys.com is only a backup archive!

Twin Update 8.5.2023


Warning to Amazon Data Services Singapore
Warning to Amazon Data Services Japan
Do stop your sabotage or you will be shot!

Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Meryl Dorey takes part in lethal acid attack  (Read 12782 times)

worelia

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 536
Meryl Dorey takes part in lethal acid attack
« on: May 21, 2013, 03:32:51 AM »

Look at the emphasized part:

[*quote*]
Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

I have personally used black salve and it worked perfectly! I have been cited by the Therapeutic Goods Administration three times now for daring to say this and for selling Elaine Hollingsworth's One Answer to Cancer information DVD. As a citizen of Australia, I have the right to care for my own health in my own way and to discuss this with others. I oppose the tyranny of the TGA.

[*/quote*]

Note: That happened "about 1 month ago". Which is a long time after Meryl Dorey was forced to retract her false claims about the black salve.

source:
http://www.change.org/en-AU/users/8993331

[*quote*]
change.org 
k Start a petition 
l Browse 
f   
 Login or Sign Up   
 
Meryl Dorey

BANGALOW, Australia

Recent Activity
Meryl Dorey recruited M to sign the petition
 · 10 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Therese to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Kate  to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Kerrie to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Ann to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Renata to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Paul to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Phillippa to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Kelly to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Laureen to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Kim to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Chris to sign the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · 11 days ago
NSW Government, The Newspapers and Media: Say NO to Compulsory Vaccination

Meryl Dorey recruited Anna to sign the petition
 · 28 days ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Fran to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Chris to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited john to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Lorraine to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Annika to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Agnieszka to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Damian to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Catherine to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Heather to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Craig to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited John to sign the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

I have personally used black salve and it worked perfectly! I have been cited by the Therapeutic Goods Administration three times now for daring to say this and for selling Elaine Hollingsworth's One Answer to Cancer information DVD. As a citizen of Australia, I have the right to care for my own health in my own way and to discuss this with others. I oppose the tyranny of the TGA.


Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

Meryl Dorey recruited Cyndi to sign the petition
 · 5 months ago
Nepean Health Service: I want answers about my son's death and his deleted records

Meryl Dorey recruited Kim to sign the petition
 · 5 months ago
Nepean Health Service: I want answers about my son's death and his deleted records

 Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · 5 months ago
Nepean Health Service: I want answers about my son's death and his deleted records

Medical doctors are nearly the number 1 cause of death in Australia and most other developed countries. They must be held accountable for the harm they can cause. Doctors should not be covering up for other doctors.

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · 5 months ago
Nepean Health Service: I want answers about my son's death and his deleted records

Meryl Dorey recruited Fiona to sign the petition
 · about 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Mindano to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited David to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Annie to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Christina to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Deborah to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Joanna to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Andre to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited gail to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Kathy to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Donna to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Tina to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Lilia to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Marissa to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Joan to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Aneeta to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Natalie to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Protect University Education in Natural Medicine

Meryl Dorey recruited Carole to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited R to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Donna to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Sanofi Pasteur - Truth Now!

Meryl Dorey recruited Florian to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Matt to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Tess to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Federal and State Governments of Australia: Stop Aus. Govt. Funds for Mental Health Screening of our Children.

 Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Federal and State Governments of Australia: Stop Aus. Govt. Funds for Mental Health Screening of our Children.

When the government tries to make childhood a pathological condition, it is sign that our leaders have gone mad! Let them stick to infrastructure and keeping the streets safe. They have no place trying to tell us how to raise our kids or what treatments we use to keep our families healthy.

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Federal and State Governments of Australia: Stop Aus. Govt. Funds for Mental Health Screening of our Children.

Meryl Dorey recruited Daphne to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Paul to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited tremora to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Jessica to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Mark to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Nevine to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited maha to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Marcel to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Christine to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Neil to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Narelle to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Nimrod to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited linda to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Katy to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Bree  to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Brigitta to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Catherine to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Aneeta to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Tone  to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Andrew to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Allison to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Anna to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey recruited Anne to sign the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey signed the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Meryl Dorey started the petition
 · over 1 year ago
Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children

Impact
7
Actions
72
Recruits
Started by Meryl

Do not penalise parents by $2,100 for choosing not to vaccinate their children
3,036 Supporters 

Top CausesHuman Rights
2 Actions
36 Recruits
Health
2 Actions
13 Recruits
Education
1 Action
8 Recruits

Friends
View all 68 friends 2


change.org
g
Z

Empowering people everywhere to create the change they want to see.
About
 · Staff
 · Jobs
 · Blog 

B CorpWe're proud to be a certified B Corp, using the power of business for social good.


k Start a petition
Victories
 · Tips & Guides 
nChange.org for
Organisations
_ Contact us
Help
 · Press
 · Legal
 · Advertise 
 
In the press
The New York Times
CNN
Bloomber Buidnessweek
© 2013, Change.org Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy
 · Terms of Service
 · Ad Guidelines
 · Developers
[*quote*]


[Typo fixed. ET]
« Last Edit: May 22, 2013, 01:03:11 AM by el_Typo »
Logged
MASS MURDERERS:

Responsible for more than 83 dead: Taylor Winterstein, Edwin Tamasese


http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=11338.msg27786#msg27786

worelia

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 536
Re: Meryl Dorey takes part in lethal acid attack
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2013, 03:47:28 AM »

Meryl Dorey plays foul. She abuses the legal system to down and gag her critics. Here is a report of yesterday:

[*quote*]
The AVO makes the news (20/5/2013)
I woke up on Monday morning to find my Twitter stream and Facebook timeline full reports of a story in the Sydney Daily Telegraph.



Image source: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2013/0520avntele.jpg

The words said:

THE founder of a controversial anti-immunisation group has been accused of using apprehended violence orders to gag her critics. Former Australian Vaccination Network president Meryl Dorey has applied for AVOs against three of her most vocal opponents. As a special condition of the AVOs, she wanted the men banned from making online comments about her in "any derogatory manner".

But she suffered a setback last month when her AVO was thrown out against one critic, Peter Bowditch, who she claimed posted harassing and abusive messages online.

She also took out an AVO against Daniel Raffaele, who helped start the Stop the Australian Vaccination Network group, claiming he made threatening calls to her. Mr Raffaele, who denied making any threatening calls, said he eventually agreed to the order because he was "sick of dealing with it", although he made sure her "gag order" was struck out. "The only thing I was never going to agree to was being silenced on the internet," Mr Raffaele said. "The information (the AVN) spread is dangerous and it's not based on anything other than lies - and it costs lives."

In his submissions to court, Mr Bowditch said he lived 750km from Ms Dorey's home at Bangalow, near Byron Bay, so there was little chance he would come into contact with her if she genuinely feared for her safety. "It is obvious to me that this application ... is actually an attempt to prevent me speaking about or criticising (her) activities," he said.

Western Australia-based Dan Buzzard, another AVN opponent, said Ms Dorey probably saw taking out the AVOs as a "quick and easy" way to silence her critics. He will defend the application today. [Note: the paper got it wrong - the hearing is scheduled for Friday, May 24]

Ms Dorey refused to comment on the applications but denied using the AVOs to shut up her opponents. She said she had received anonymous death threats and had only taken the AVOs out at the suggestion of police. Ms Dorey accused The Daily Telegraph of running a campaign against parents who chose not to vaccinate their children and said she was still "taking legal advice" on appealing the magistrate's decision to dismiss her AVO against Mr Bowditch.

Meanwhile, Premier Barry O'Farrell said he would consider new laws giving childcare centres the power to refuse entry to kids who had not been vaccinated, one of the aims of The Daily Telegraph and The Sunday Telegraph's No Jab, No Play campaign. He said the government was committed to lifting the number of vaccinated children.

You can read the story in the Daily Telegraph.
[*/quote*]


Isn't this


(http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2013/0520avntele.jpg)
nearer to the truth than this foto?


(http://d22r54gnmuhwmk.cloudfront.net/photos/8/if/eh/ouIfehNQWIokcmB-172x172-cropped.jpg]

Logged
MASS MURDERERS:

Responsible for more than 83 dead: Taylor Winterstein, Edwin Tamasese


http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=11338.msg27786#msg27786

worelia

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 536
Re: Meryl Dorey takes part in lethal acid attack
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2013, 03:49:14 AM »

There goes...

the url of the above quote: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/avn.htm
Logged
MASS MURDERERS:

Responsible for more than 83 dead: Taylor Winterstein, Edwin Tamasese


http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=11338.msg27786#msg27786

worelia

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 536
Re: Meryl Dorey takes part in lethal acid attack
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2013, 04:07:48 AM »

Meryl Dorey is very aggressive. But watch it! See her in the retraction case.

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2013/05may.htm#20oppt

[*quote*]
Permalink   
And there's Parliament (20/5/2013)


On May 14, the Health Legislation Amendment Act 2013 came into law in New South Wales. The loophole in the 1993 legislation that allowed the AVN to escape its responsibilities last year and claim a massive victory has been closed. Now any concerned citizen can make a complaint to the Health Care Complaints Commission about any quack. And Parliament is now talking about legislation to restrict access of the pox-ridden offspring of vaccine deniers to kindergartens and child care centres. And in the Federal Parliament instructions have been given to health bureaucrats by the relevant Minister that henceforth people who claim to be "conscientious objectors" to vaccination (in order to steal government benefits tied to full vaccination of their children) will be officially called "vaccine refusers".

New!
Permalink   
And then there's the TGA (20/5/2013)

Some time ago Meryl Dorey appeared on the Internet radio station Fair Dinkum Radio and promoted Black Salve as a cure for cancer. This is an escharotic paste, that is it is a caustic preparation that effectively dissolves any tissues it comes in contact with. It is about as useful a cancer cure as burning cancer away with a blowtorch, although it works a little slower. The Therapeutic Goods Administration politely asked Ms Dorey and Leon Pittard at the radio station to display a notice on their web sites admitting that they had been promoting this dangerous and useless nostrum. They refused. The TGA has now gone one step further and issued an order, not a request, to display the following notice on the AVN web site.



(image source: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2013/0520avntga.jpg)

Heels are being dug in and resistance is building. What is different now is that a couple of newspapers have decided to take on the AVN and all its idiocy, and stories like the one at the right are regularly appearing. (The particular story never made it to the paper's web site, so a picture is as good as it gets.)

Here is the text of the retraction. It should be noted that the TGA set specifications for the size of the retraction and the font colour and size. It also has to be displayed as HTML code, not as an image (which is how most crooks try to avoid such notices being indexed by search engines).

RETRACTION

An advertisement promoting illegal therapeutic goods under the name “Black Salve”, which we published on this website, should not have been published. In publishing the advertisement, we misled and abused the trust of consumers.

In the advertisement we unlawfully made claims that Black Salve is safe, and that it can be used as an effective treatment for cancers including skin cancer. We also claimed that cancer medicines are harmful and cause cancer, and are ineffectual.

A complaint about the advertisement was recently upheld by the Complaints Resolution Panel. We provided no evidence whatsoever to support the claims we made, and the Panel found that the claims were unlawful, misleading, and unverified and breached the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code (Code).

The full text of the Panel’s determination can be found at: www.tgacrp.com.au/complaints

The delegate of the Secretary for the purposes of regulation 9 of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 also found that the claims and representation in the advertisement were unlawful, inaccurate and misleading in breach of the Code.

The attention of consumers is directed to the safety information from the Therapeutic Goods Administration at: http://www.tga.gov.au/consumers/information-salve-cansema.htm

You can read the entire order here.
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2013/0520avntga.pdf


New!
Permalink   
But wait, there's more (20/5/2013)

As part of the continuous process of monitoring and investigating the AVN and its interaction with government authorities, the correspondence between the TGA and the AVN over Black Salve was acquired under Freedom of Information rules. Most of it was just a to-and-fro of argument about the legality or otherwise of selling or advertising products and what the definitions of words like "advertise" really are. Then, right at the end, Ms Dorey threw down what she assumed would be her trump card. She claimed Freeman Of The Land protection.

I won't go into details of this particular form of insanity here, but it is based on the idea that each person is actually two people - a person and that person's Personal Representative. One of these people (I'm not sure which) is a legal fiction who has no contract with the government or any other institutions of society and therefore is not bound by any obligations to pay taxes, rent or bank interest or to be restricted in action by any law of the government, governments being themselves legal fictions that don't really exist. Or something like that. Look up "Freeman Of The Land" and "One People's Private Trust" in your favourite search engine, but be sitting down and be prepared to laugh heartily at how insane people can be and still manage to turn on a computer.

I listened to Leon Pittard at Fair Dinkum Radio rant on about this nonsense once, so I know where Merly Dorey got the idea. She wrote to the official in the TGA in "his private capacity" (that is, as his Personal Representative, not the physical man behind a desk in Canberra) and tried to set things right. Read. Enjoy. Click on the picture for a larger version. (I have redacted the name of the official. He is probably still laughing, but he doesn't need his name associated with idiocy.)


(document source: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/ni/history/13/0520avnoppt.pdf)

See more PhD Comics here
May 11, 2013
[*/quote*]

Logged
MASS MURDERERS:

Responsible for more than 83 dead: Taylor Winterstein, Edwin Tamasese


http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=11338.msg27786#msg27786

worelia

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 536
Logged
MASS MURDERERS:

Responsible for more than 83 dead: Taylor Winterstein, Edwin Tamasese


http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=11338.msg27786#msg27786

worelia

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 536
Re: Meryl Dorey takes part in lethal acid attack
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2013, 04:49:40 AM »

Now to the acid attack. Again, look at the emphasized part:

[*quote*]
Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

I have personally used black salve and it worked perfectly! I have been cited by the Therapeutic Goods Administration three times now for daring to say this and for selling Elaine Hollingsworth's One Answer to Cancer information DVD. As a citizen of Australia, I have the right to care for my own health in my own way and to discuss this with others. I oppose the tyranny of the TGA.
[*/quote*]

(source: http://www.change.org/en-AU/users/8993331)

The devastating results of the black salve are described here:
http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=7675

http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/eschar.html

[*QUOTE*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Use Corrosive Cancer Salves (Escharotics)
Stephen Barrett, M.D.

 Many salves, pastes, poultices, and plasters have been applied directly to tumors with the hope of burning them away. Zinc oxide, bloodroot, and several other herbs are common ingredients. Some marketers claim that corrosive agents (sometimes called "black salves") can "draw out" the cancer. In recent years, scientists have found chemicals that can destroy certain superficial skin cancers. Except for these, however, corrosive agents are worthless against cancer and cannot be legally marketed for that purpose in the United States.

Corrosive salves are often referred to as "escharotics" because they produce a thick, dry scab called an "eschar" on the skin. Their use to treat cancer dates back hundreds of years, perhaps even to ancient times. Their use was fairly common during the 18th and 19th centuries. If a tumor is confined to the superficial layers of the skin, it would be possible to burn it off with a corrosive salve or paste. Unfortunately, products capable of accomplishing this can also burn the surrounding normal tissue and result in unnecessary scarring. For superficial cancers—for which the cure rate with standard treatment is nearly 100%—it makes much more sense to use standard methods that can destroy the cancer with little or no damage to the nearby tissues. Some salves are also promoted for treating herpes, venereal, diseases, diabetes, and lupus.

This idea that eschartics can "draw out" cancers from underneath the skin is preposterous. Furthermore, even if a product could do this, it could not influence cancers that have spread (metastasized) to distant regions of the body.

 Some currently marketed escharotics contain bloodroot (Sanguinaria candensis), zinc chloride, or both. However, because cancer salves are not manufactured under government supervision, it may not even be possible to know what is in them. People who use such products without benefit of medical consultation run additional risks. Untrained individuals may incorrectly conclude that a growth is cancerous when it is not. Skin cancers that can spread should be medically investigated to see whether they have done so, and some of these require extensive treatment even though they might not look dangerous to the naked eye. In addition, although escharotics may appear to destroy cancers on the surface of the skin, the user will not be able to tell whether cancer remains under the skin where it can continue to grow without immediate detection.

In 2002, the Archives of Dermatology published a report of four patients who had used escharotic agents instead of standard treatment for a basal cell cancer [1]. In the first patient, the visible tumor was removed and the skin healed. However, a biopsy several months later a biopsy showed that cancer remained under the skin. The second patient successfully eradicated his tumors but sustained severe scarring that required surgery to repair. The third patient had successful surgery for several tumors but was unhappy about tiny scars and the cost of the procedures. When last seen by the authors, he had 2 large swellings covered with a thick central eschar, one on each side of his neck as a result of treatment by an "herbalist." The fourth patient came to the authors with a large basal cell cancer of the nose, lip, and cheek that required extensive surgery to remove and later metastasized to his bones. Several years earlier, when the cancer was in its early stages, he had refused surgery and chosen instead to treat it with an escharotic. The cancer appeared to have been healed, but obviously was not. The authors warned that many of the skin disorders referred to in testimonials published on Web sites that market escharotics were not medically diagnosed so that it would not be possible to judge whether they were benign growths or, if cancerous, had actually been cured. The extreme danger of using escharotics products is illustrated by the experience of Ruth Conrad, an Idaho woman who consulted one of the state's many unlicensed naturopaths in 1984. While seeking treatment for a sore shoulder, she also complained of a bump on her nose. The naturopath stated that it was cancer and gave her a black herbal salve to apply directly. Within a few days, her face became very painful and she developed red streaks that ran down her cheeks. Her anxious phone call to the naturopath brought the explanation that the presence of the lines was a good sign because they "resemble a crab, and cancer is a crab." He also advised her to apply more of the black salve. Within a week, a large part of her face, including her nose, sloughed off. It took 3 years and 17 plastic surgery operations to reconstruct her face. During a deposition, the naturopath stated that he had obtained the salve from a woman in Mexico and that he didn't know who had manufactured it. The picture shows the extent of the injured area.       



http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Gifs/conrad256.jpg


Regulatory Actions

Salves intended for the treatment of cancers cannot be legally marketed. The FDA has banned the importation of all "black salve" products, including Cansema Black, Topical Salve, Cansema Deep Tissue, Cansema w/Lugol's Iodine (topical), Cansema for Cats, Dogs, and Horses, Cansema Tonic I, Cansema Tonic II, Cansema Tonic III, Cansema Capsules, Cansema Suppositories, Bloodroot Paste, C-Herb Paste, CAN-X, Cancerx, H3O, and Healing Formula [2].

In 2004, Gregory James Caton, of Lake Charles, Louisiana, was sentenced to 33 months imprisonment to be followed by 3 years supervised release for marketing several products with claims that they could cure cancer and other diseases. Court documents indicate that from 1999 to 2003, doing business as Alpha Omega Labs, Caton and his employees sold Cancema Tonic III (a purported cancer cure) and H3O (claimed to be effective against athlete's foot, cuts and burns, eczema, fingernail fungus, chronic gas, gastroenteritis, gingivitis and periodontal disease, halitosis, herpes sores, ophthalmia, psoriasis, sore throat, strep throat, and wounds) [3].

In April 2005, the FDA ordered Two Feathers, Inc., of Reno, Nevada, to stop marketing an escharotic salve called Two Feathers [4]

Later in 2005, Lois March, M.D., an ear, nose, and throat specialist who practiced in Cotrell, Georgia, surrendered her medical license to settle charges that she improperly helped Dan Raber, an unlicensed person who treated patients for cancer. Georgia’s Composite Board of Medical Examiners had accused March of providing pain management to several patients whom Raber treated with a bloodroot paste, including one man whose flesh was eaten so badly from his shoulder that the bone was exposed [5]. Press reports indicate that the FDA raided Raber's farm.

In April 2006, the FDA ordered Risingsun Health Alternatives and Herbs, a division of MacAdam Health Enterprises of Livingston, Montana, to stop its illegal marketing of Cansema products [6]. Although the company owner promised several times to stop the illegal marketing, he did not stop. After making several undercover purchases, the FDA obtained a consent decree for a permanent injunction [7,8].

In May 2008, the FDA ordered Best on Earth Products of Las Vegas, Nevada, to stop marketing corrosive salves with claims that they are effective against cancer. The company's Web site had stated:

While historically, black salve and bloodroot salves have been used for melanoma, basal and squamous cell carcinomas. . . we at Best on Earth Products are not legally allowed to make such claims. Such claims made by companies would put these products into the category of "new drugs" based on the FDA definition. Again, we do not make such claims regarding our products."

The company responded by removing the illegal claims but continued to sell black salve products.

The FDA warned that this type of "disclaimer" would not protect against prosecution because other parts of the site (including metatags), had made it clear that the products were intended to treat cancer [9].

In September 2008, the Federal Trade Commission secured a consent agreement with Holly A. Bacon (d/b/a Cleansing Time Pro), who had marketed " black salve" ointment and tablets with claims that both products were effective against all forms of cancer, as well as against hepatitus, HIV, SARS, and Avian Flu and other viruses. The agreement bans her from making unsubstantiated claims about any product [10].
Advocacy by Andrew Weil

Andrew Weil, M.D., who promotes himself as "your trusted health advisor," has been a strong proponent of bloodroot paste. His 1995 book Spontaneous Healing states that after reading a letter from a user he "was able to find a number of references about its peculiar ability to dissolve abnormal growths on the skin without harming normal tissue." Six months later, when his dog got a black growth on his skin, he applied a bloodroot paste, noted that "the whole tumor" fell off after a few days, and concluded that the end result was "a perfectly circular, slightly depressed area of skin, with no trace of tumor." After trying it out on a friend, he began teaching medical students how to use it with outcomes that were "consistent and satisfactory." [11] Reading this account shortly after the book was published, I was struck by four things:
The idea that bloodroot kills only cancer cells and spares normal ones is preposterous.
There was no mention of a biopsy, without which it might not be possible to be certain that his friend had a cancer.
Weil does not mention how he determined that medical students who followed his advice had "consistent and satisfactory outcomes." Some skin cancers that are left behind will not become apparent until months or even years after they are treated. Without a formal follow-up study, it is impossible to determine the long-term outcome.
The naked eye cannot tell where the margin of a skin cancer is located because there can be microscopic spread beyond the obvious tumor. When simple surgery is performed, the surgeon removes the obvious area plus a small amount of surrounding tissue. If the pathology report shows no tumor at the specimen margins, it is assumed that the entire tumor has been removed. If cancer shows at the margins, further surgery is performed. Today, Weil's Web site acknowledges this point by stating "I do not recommend using bloodroot paste, or anything else for that matter, for the self-treatment of skin cancers. It might not get all malignant tissue. Only examination by biopsy can confirm a diagnosis or a cure." [12] However, even this statement is irresponsible because bloodroot paste is not a sensible treatment no matter who applies it. Nevertheless, for more than four years, Weil's Web site carried an article that plugged bloodroot and linked to four companies that would supply information and products [13]

Three More Victims

A recent book, Natural Causes, describes what happened after Weil's Web site persuaded Sue Gilliatt of Indianapolis, Indiana to use bloodroot products. According to the book, her primary care physician removed a bump on her nose that was diagnosed as a benign tumor called a fibroadenoma. But Gilliatt feared that it was cancerous and, even though she was given a referral to a dermatologist, wound up buying Cansema from the Alpha Omega Alpha Web site and a bloodroot paste from Dan Raber. The Cancema stung so badly that she was unable to keep in on for the recommended 24 hours and applied Raber's paste instead. Within a few hours after she applied it to her nose, her face became puffy and her eyes were nearly swollen shut. Instead of consulting her doctor, she phoned Raber who persuaded her to apply more paste. Six days later, when she had her appointment with the dermatologist, a large part of her nose had been destroyed.

Two other black salve victims have shared their stories with me:Gail Bumpus, of Singer Island, Florida, was the victim of 84-year-old Jerome Craft, M.D., a board-certified plastic surgeon who advertised in the Yellow Pages as a specialist in cancer and burns. In 2005, she consulted him about possible surgery for excess skin under her nose. During the first two visits, without taking a biopsy, Craft said that she had extensive cancer in the nose and that a black salve that he had invented would remove the cancer without leaving any scars. After the salve was applied, her nose became extremely painful and her face swelled "like a pumpkin." Although an emergency room physician advised hospitalization, Craft talked her into remaining under his care for ten more days, during which time she experienced excruciating pain but was reassured that she would be fine. When she finally returned to the hospital, she was admitted for five days and treated with massive doses of antibiotics. When the dead tissue was removed from her nasal area, it was apparent that her nose had been burned off. So far she has had six operations to reconstruct a nose. In 2007, the Florida Board of Medicine secured a consent agreement under which Craft was reprimanded, fined $9,000, ordered to pay administrative costs, and banned from using "black salve" again [14].   



http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/Gifs/bumpus1.gif
Appearance before the salve was applied   



http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/Gifs/bumpus2.gif
A few days after the salve was applied, most of her nose was destroyed.

In 2006, a woman in Liberty Hill, Texas, developed a small but deep-rooted cancer on the skin of her nose that was biopsied and diagnosed by a dermatologist. Surgery was recommended, but her sister, who has practiced as a "master herbalist" for many years, persuaded her that a bloodroot paste would do a better job. The first picture shows how her nose and the surrounding skin became inflamed. The second picture shows the hole in her nose that resulted. The paste destroyed some areas of bone and cartilage, which meant that when the wound healed, she required extensive plastic surgery. She also reported that the inflamed area was extremely painful for more than a week.       



http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/Gifs/teel1.gif



http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/Gifs/teel4.gif


Mohs Surgery

Mohs micrographic surgery is a state-of-the-art treatment for skin cancer in which the physician (usually a dermatologist) serves as surgeon, pathologist, and reconstructive surgeon. It begins with surgical removal of the visible tumor and microscopic examination of the specimen. If cancer is seen at the margins, the suspected area plus a thin margin is removed and the process is repeated until it appears that all of the cancer has been located and removed. The end result is a very high cure rate (over 99% for new cancers and 95% for recurrent cancers) with minimal removal of healthy tissue [15].

The Bottom Line

Skin cancers should be medically diagnosed and treated. Those located in readily visible areas (eyes, nose, lips, or scalp) should be treated with Mohs surgery. The types of products described in this article are extremely dangerous. Their sellers deserve to be imprisoned.

References

McDaniel S. Goldman GD. Consequences of using escharotic agents as primary treatment for nonmelanoma skin cancer. Archives of Dermatology 138:1593-1596, 2002.
Import Alert #66-41: "Unapproved new drugs promoted in the U.S." Revised April 6, 2006.
Lake Charles man sentenced for selling and shipping unapproved new drugs. USDOJ news release, Aug 24, 2004.
Cassens BJ. Warning letter to Two Feathers, Inc., and Robert Roy. April 13, 2005.
In the matter of Lois March, M.D. Before the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings. Filed July 26, 2005.
Breen CM. Warning Letter to Greta Armstrong. April 6, 2006.
Complaint for permanent injunction. USA v. Toby Carl McAdam and Greta Armstrong, d/b/a/ Rising Sun Health. Case 1:10-cv-00128-RFC. U.S. District Court for the District of Montana. Filed Oct 13, 2010.
Consent decree of permanent ijunction. USA v. Toby Carl McAdam and Greta Armstrong, d/b/a/ Rising Sun Health. Case 1:10-cv-00128-RFC. U.S. District Court for the District of Montana. Filed Oct 13, 2010.
Cassens B. Warning letter to Best on Earth Products, May 20, 2008.
Agreement containing consent order. In the matter of Holly A. Bacon, doing business as Cleansing Time Pro. FTC file # 082-3119, announced Sept 18, 2008.
Weil A. Spontaneous Healing. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995, pp 48-51.
Weil A. Bloodroot for skin cancer? Dr. Weil.com, Jan 9, 2006.
Hurley D. Natural Causes: Death, Lies, and Politics in America's Vitamin and Herbal Supplement Industry. New York: Broadway Books, 2006.
Complaint. Florida Department of Health vs. Jerome W. Craft, M.D. DOH case number 2005-03020, filed May 2, 2006.
About Mohs micrographic surgery. American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology Web site, accessed December 12, 2006.

This article was revised on January 1, 2011.

Make a Donation  |  Search All of Our Affiliated Sites  |  Home

Links to Recommended Vendors
Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database. Trustworthy information on dietary supplements and herbs.
PharmacyChecker.com: Compare drug prices and save money at verified online pharmacies.
ConsumerLab.com: Evaluates the quality of dietary supplement and herbal products.
Bukh Law Firm: Free phone consultation for health fraud victims.
OnlyMyEmail: Award-winning anti-spam services.
Herbal Medicine, 3rd edition. Excellent reference book, discount-priced.
10 Types: Website design, development, and hosting with superb technical support.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/QUOTE*]


Despite the TGA retraction order Meryl Dorey still makes false medical claims. How long will it take till she is stopped by a straightjacket? She advertises for the fraud with the etching salve which can have lethal consequences. She still advertises for the fraud months after the retraction order. She lies about vaccination. She harasses parents of dead newborns. She abuses the legal system with AVOs. She makes libeling allegations against her critics.

Can a person be so insane like she acts? Or is she not insane but criminal through and through? How many children died because of her? How many children suffer because of her? How many children are disabled because of her? The legal system is at its limit: either it puts an end to the crimes of Meryl Dorey or it declares its bankruptcy.


[Typo fixed. ET]
« Last Edit: May 22, 2013, 01:04:27 AM by el_Typo »
Logged
MASS MURDERERS:

Responsible for more than 83 dead: Taylor Winterstein, Edwin Tamasese


http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=11338.msg27786#msg27786

worelia

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 536
Re: Meryl Dorey takes part in lethal acid attack
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2013, 08:04:15 PM »

The TGA ordered Mery Dorey to retract her advertising and claims concerning the black salve. In February of this year we have this article on this matter:

[*quote*]
Former AVN president forced to retract advertising on black salve

15th Feb 2013
Andrew Bracey

A TGA complaints resolution panel has ordered former Australian Vaccination Network president Meryl Dorey to retract advertisements for black salve on the grounds claims regarding the product were misleading.

The finding follows a complaint concerning audio material published at the website www.fairdinkumradio.com that appeared in the context of an interview between Ms Dorey and Leon Pittard which the panel found constituted an advertisement.

In an excerpt from the interview included in the panel’s decision, Ms Dorey said “one of the DVDs that we sell is by Elaine Hollingsworth and it's called One Answer to Cancer. Now Elaine runs a health retreat up on the Gold Coast called Hippocrates Health, and she was almost killed by a mainstream cancer treatment called... Altara (sic), I could have the name wrong. It’s been banned in many countries and she had skin cancer, was given this treatment, and it almost killed her. And as a result of that experience she found a treatment that's been used for at least two thousand years, called black salve”.

Ms Dorey went on to describe black salve as “a combination of herbs and minerals that is applied topically to cancer and it's called ‘Nature's Scalpel’”.

“Now, I've used it myself on a cancer that I had on my shoulder and I've gotta tell you it is like a scalpel. It cut it out in a perfect circle and it got rid of it completely.”

In March last year the TGA issued a warning against the use of red or black salves in the treatment of skin disorders after it was notified of three cases where consumers had caused serious harm to their skin by using the salves.
[...]
[*/quote*]

read more: http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/former-avn-president-forced-to-retract-advertising-on-black-salve

How long ago did this happen? The article was published in mid February. That is two months ago. One month ago, that is one month after the article, Meryl Dorey wrote these statements in public:

[*quote*]
Meryl Dorey commented on the petition
 · about 1 month ago
Australian Government: Decriminalise the use of Cansema/Black Salve on human beings

I have personally used black salve and it worked perfectly! I have been cited by the Therapeutic Goods Administration three times now for daring to say this and for selling Elaine Hollingsworth's One Answer to Cancer information DVD. As a citizen of Australia, I have the right to care for my own health in my own way and to discuss this with others. I oppose the tyranny of the TGA.
[*/quote*]

(source: http://www.change.org/en-AU/users/8993331)

Meryl Dorey insists: "I have the right to care for my own health in my own way and to discuss this with others."

If  Meryl Dorey decides to do it, she can shoot herself. No objection to that, honestly. But she must not advertise for a potentially lethal fraud. And for sure she must neither sell nor distribute for free DVDs that have a high influence on desperate persons deadly ill with cancer. Didn't Meryl Dorey accuse the parents of deceased pertussis victim Dana McCaffery of being bought by "big pharma"?

As for Dana McCaffery, there is some details to be read:
http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=7551
http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=7586
http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=7809

How does Meryl Dorey's despicable behavior fit? I say, it fits her well. It fits perfectly for a totally immoral and ruthless liar whose only interest is to have his will, no matter how many will die for this.

When Meryl Dorey says that she did never ever tell people not to vaccinate, she lies. All she says and writes all the time is nothing but seeding fear, nothing but accusing "big pharma". She knows very well that parents will become afraid of vaccination. So Meryl Dorey is a liar, and, posing such a danger to children unborn and born, to persons of all ages, this menace must be stopped by the state. If we need a lex Meryl Dorey, then it be so. Stop that murdering liar Meryl Dorey. Do it. Do it. Do it! Do it now!


[Typo fixed. ET]
« Last Edit: May 22, 2013, 01:02:32 AM by el_Typo »
Logged
MASS MURDERERS:

Responsible for more than 83 dead: Taylor Winterstein, Edwin Tamasese


http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=11338.msg27786#msg27786

worelia

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 536
AVN CFA Objection Appendices Redacted
« Reply #7 on: April 15, 2014, 09:27:03 PM »

http://www.scribd.com/doc/218509568/AVN-CFA-Objection-Appendices-Redacted

[*quote*]

AVN CFA Objection Appendices Redacted

Ratings: (0)|Views: 5|Likes: 0
Published by Ken McLeod

Correspondence with the Minister for Charities concerning the AVN's charity licence. Appendices have been redacted but will be added later.
See More



http://htmlimg4.scribdassets.com/4ffxkas7nk3onsea/images/1-c680956533.jpg
 
donation on 13 February 2014. An appeal largely led by our Facebook group ‘Stop the Australian (anti-) Vaccination Network’ SAVN, reached the $10,000 target that night. To date, the AVN has donated nothing. This ‘charity’ raised $1,992,020 over the previous eight years but can't donate anything to help a disabled child? Yet, Ms Dorey had no trouble raising $11,187.50 overnight to pay her legal costs
23
 when she lost her (vexatious) case,
24
 
so we know that the money is there.
9. – BREACHES OF CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING ACT S47 AND REGULATION 13.
At Appendix 4, beginning at page 17, you will find correspondence between you, your department and Dr Anne Coady, who has submitted requests pursuant to the Act and Regulation for information from the AVN and Ms Dorey. You will see that Ms Dorey and the AVN have refused to comply, that Dr Coady has complained to you of this breach of the Act and Regulation, and that your department has failed to act. At the very least Dr Coady’s complaint should have led to an audit, but it did not. Part of the reason for that failure, and only part, was Ms Dorey’s claims that she is being subjected to harassment. Your department accepted Dorey’s allegations without any checking or request for substantiation. Your office should have known that this is Standard Operating Procedure for Ms Dorey; to allege harassment and threats of violence whenever she is being asked to conform to the law. Your office should know that when her allegations have been put to the test in Court, they have been rejected. Indeed, in the case of Dorey vs. Buzzard,
25
Ms Dorey has made this allegation many times in order to avoid scrutiny, and always the government departments have accepted the allegations without quibble. As Dr Coady says in her correspondence she is deeply affronted that your department would accept those outrageous allegations so. her allegations were thrown out and costs were awarded against her. Remember that in civil cases such as this, the decision is based on ‘the balance of probabilities,’ a very low bar, not ‘beyond reasonable doubt.’ Dr Coady is not the only one to make this complaint. Your files will show that I and many others have made the same complaints, and in all cases since the AVN’s Charitable Fundraising Authority was restored, your department has failed to act.
23
 Email 27 August 2013.
24
 http://www.danbuzzard.net/storage/AVO-costs-letter.pdf
25
 http://www.danbuzzard.net/storage/AVO-costs-letter.pdf
page 7
 
 8. – AVN DEFIES TGA ORDERS
On 16 August 2012 The AVN and Ms Dorey were found by the TGA
26
 to have promoted the dangerous alternative medicine known as ‘Black Salve’ for treating cancer. The TGA ordered the AVN to withdraw representations, withdraw the advertisement, and publish a retraction. The AVN refused to comply, and so on 16 May 2013 the TGA issued a ’Regulation 9 Order to Comply.’
27
 Again, the AVN has refused to comply. On 20 September 2009, the TGA again found
28
 that on another occasion Ms Dorey had promoted ‘Black Salve’ to treat cancer.
29
 Again, the TGA ordered Ms Dorey to withdraw representations, withdraw the advertisement, and publish a retraction. Again, Ms Dorey refused to comply. On 15 November 2012 the TGA found
30
 that the AVN’s magazine ‘Living Wisdom’ had published misleading advertisements for ‘Total Care’ and ‘Bio-Chelat’ and ‘DentaCare Mouthwash.’ Again the TGA ordered the AVN to withdraw representations, withdraw the advertisement, and publish a retraction. Again, the AVN refused to comply. Defying orders from a government regulator and promoting life-threatening potions is not the activity of any charity. If for no other reason, this should be sufficient reason to have the AVN’s Charitable Fundraising Authority cancelled.
9. THE LEGAL DEFINITION OF CHARITY
As you are no doubt aware, the definition of a ‘charity’ was recently changed by the
Charities Act 2013 No. 100, (Commonwealth). The AVN does not meet the Public Benefit requirements of the Act.
'S
6 Purposes for the public benefit (1) A purpose that an entity has is for the
 public benefit
 if: (a) the achievement of the purpose would be of public benefit; and
26
 http://www.tgacrp.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=13&special=complaint_single&complaintID=2081
27
 http://www.tga.gov.au/industry/advertising-reg9-2012-04-022-black-salve.htm
28
 
28
 http://www.tgacrp.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=13&special=complaint_single&complaintID=2081
29
 http://www.tgacrp.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=13&special=complaint_single&complaintID=2114
30
 http://www.tgacrp.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=13&special=complaint_single&complaintID=2168
page 8
 
 (b) the purpose is directed to a benefit that is available to the members of: (i) the general public; or (ii) a sufficient section of the general public.'
The AVN is directly disqualified by the Act.
S11
'Disqualifying purpose  In this Act:
 disqualifying purpose
 means: (a) the purpose of engaging in, or promoting, activities that are unlawful or contrary to public policy;'
SUMMARY: - The AVN
engages in behaviours that in no way can be described as charitable. Indeed some are just plain evil. - These behaviours continued after the AVN’s CFA was restored, a condition of that restoration being that the AVN would behave. - The AVN has never committed a charitable act. - The AVN has breached several Acts, including the Associations Incorporation Act, the Charitable Fundraising Act, the Charitable Trusts Act, the Therapeutic Goods Act, and direct orders from the TGA. - The AVN’s allegations of harassment were baseless and should never have been accepted; they were made to avoid scrutiny. - Over the decades, the AVN has raised many millions of dollars, none of that spent on any charitable activity. None of its Annual Financial Statements record any charitable donations to any beneficiary. - When challenged to perform a charitable act for a disabled child, whose parents claim was disabled by a vaccine, the AVN refused to respond.
page 9
 
- The AVN does not meet the new legal definition of a ‘charity.’ Minister, I repeat; there is grave disquiet in the medical community about the AVN’s activities while holding a Charitable Fundraising Authority. We urge you to order that it not be renewed. Ken McLeod Stop the Australian (anti-) Vaccination Network.
page 10
Activity (0)
Filters
Add to collectionReviewAdd noteLikeEmbed
No activity yet
More From This User

    AVN CFA Objection Appendices Redacted
    Ken McLeod
    AVN FairTrading GIPA Doc Release 29Nov2013 Redactions
    Ken McLeod
    CRP 2013-04-006 Hippocrates Vaginal-Rectal Syringe.pdf
    Ken McLeod
    The Transcript of the Public Hearing Qld Parlt Ctee
    Ken McLeod
    Number of antigens in early childhood vaccines and neurop...
    Ken McLeod
    Avn Dorey Investigation Findings
    Ken McLeod
    AVN_AFS_2011
    Ken McLeod
    ACMA Final Report 2976 May 2013 Media Watch
    Ken McLeod
    ACMA Final Report 2976 May 2013
    Ken McLeod
    93288553-ParlInfo-SenateDrBobBrown11111997
    Ken McLeod
    AVN Parliamentary Mentions
    Ken McLeod
    Uncollected Fines - Avn
    Ken McLeod
    The AVN s Troubles With NSW Fair Trading Round 2
    Ken McLeod
    Document Release Exposes Meryl Dorey's Tenuous Grip on Re...
    Ken McLeod
    AVN Docs GIPA Releases
    Ken McLeod
    Links to the series "Meryl Dorey's Trouble With the Truth"
    Ken McLeod
    AUSTRALIAN VACCINATION NETWORK - REGISTER OF DOCUMENTS HE...
    Ken McLeod
    Judgement Immunisation
    Ken McLeod
    To Prof Marchant 14 June 2012 (1)
    Ken McLeod
    ACMemail30June 2012
    Ken McLeod
    When is It Ok to Lie to Members and Donors
    Ken McLeod
    BMJ_FalseBalance
    Ken McLeod
    OLGRresponse18102010complete
    Ken McLeod
    OFT GIPA Response 21 Feb 2012
    Ken McLeod

Download and print this document
[*/quote*]
Logged
MASS MURDERERS:

Responsible for more than 83 dead: Taylor Winterstein, Edwin Tamasese


http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=11338.msg27786#msg27786

worelia

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 536
AVN CFA Objection Appendices Redacted
« Reply #8 on: April 15, 2014, 09:49:45 PM »

http://www.scribd.com/doc/218509568/AVN-CFA-Objection-Appendices-Redacted

[*quote*]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
AVN CFA Objection Appendices Redacted

Published by Ken McLeod
Correspondence with the Minister for Charities concerning the AVN's charity licence. Appendices have been redacted but will be added later.

-------------------------------------------------------------------



http://htmlimg4.scribdassets.com/4ffxkas7nk3onsea/images/1-c680956533.jpg


-------------------------------------------------------------------

Ken McLeod
PO Box 51
Moruya NSW 2537
Email
: turlinja@internode.on.net
 
18 February 2014
TO: The Hon George Souris MP
Minister for Tourism, etc,
Via email
:
office@souris.minister.nsw.gov.au
 
cc: Dr Andrew McDonald MBBS (Hons), FRACP, FRCP (Glasg), FRCPCH, MP
Opposition Spokesperson for Health
Via email
:
macquariefields@parliament.nsw.gov.au
 
cc: Ms Amy Corderoy
Sydney Morning Herald
Via email:
 
acorderoy@smh.com.au
.
Dear Minister
RE: ‘AUSTRALIAN VACCINATION NETWORK’ –CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING AUTHORITY
I am one of the leaders of the unincorporated association known as 'Stop the Australian
(anti-) Vaccination Network', SAVN. Our group consists of over 11,500 supporters, and a
recent survey showed that about two-thirds of them have a degree in science, medicine,
nursing, law, etc.
We have been deeply concerned about the activities of the Australian Vaccination Network,
AVN, for several years, and we have instigated amendments to legislation and several
inquiries by Fair Trading, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the Health Care Complaints
Commission and the Office of Liquor Gaming and Racing. Further, following our complaints,
the AVN has been found to have misled the public by the Australian Communications and
Media Authority,
1
 the ABC Complaints Unit,
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 and ABC Media Watch, who described
the AVN’s claims as ‘bulldust.’
7
1
 
http://www.acma.gov.au/~/media/Broadcasting%20Investigations/Report/pdf/WIN%209%20Investigationsre
port%202883%20pdf.PDF
2
 http://about.abc.net.au/complaints/mornings-10/
3
 http://about.abc.net.au/complaints/mornings-6/
4
 http://about.abc.net.au/complaints/mornings-6/
page 1

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Our activities were praised in the Senate by Senator Richard Di Natale, Greens spokesman
on Health.
8
The AVN’s Charitable Fundraising Authority, (CFA 11694) is due to be renewed on 16 April
2014. We have grave concerns about this, as in no way can the AVN ever be described as a
genuine charity. In short, the AVN is, and always has been, one giant fraud. For example:
In his speech the Senator described the appalling behaviour of the AVN.
 
It was in part due to our lobbying that the Office of Fair Trading ordered the AVN to change
their name to reflect their activities and objects, an order which was upheld in the
Administrative Decisions Tribunal.
1: - OLGR’S 2010 INVESTIGATION:
Following a complaint from me, in 2010 the Office of Liquor Gaming and Racing conducted
an audit and found 24 breaches of the Charitable Fundraising Act, the Regulations and its
Authority, attracting $22,000 in fines and six months jail.
9
Specifically, your investigators found that the AVN conducted the following frauds:
1.1. Fighting Fund – to support a homeless family, allegedly seeking to avoid a court order to
immunise a child, with legal and living expenses. The appeal ran for a short time in 2008 and
raised $11,810. None of the funds were spent on this purpose.
Inexplicably, these fines were
never levied. Further, your investigators found 4 breaches of the Charitable Trusts Act.
1.2. Advertising Appeal – initially this was an appeal for the specific purpose of raising funds
for an advertisement in ‘The Australian’ commencing in March 2009 and concluding July
2009. The specific purpose was changed during the course of the appeal to fund
advertisements in ‘Child’ magazine. This appeal raised $11,910. None of the funds were
applied to the specific purposes.
1.3. Bounty Bag Program and Vaccination Testing – for a number of years the AVN solicited
donations for funding the provision of AVN material in the Bounty Bag program and testing
of vaccines. The Bounty Bag company had never heard of the AVN. No funds raised were
spent on these purposes.
5
 http://about.abc.net.au/complaints/mornings-2/
6
 http://about.abc.net.au/complaints/mornings-and-drive/
7
 http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s3601416.htm
8
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBzZirSrbWQ
9
 Your file
CI/2010/005476 http://www.scribd.com/doc/84758844/OLGRresponse18102010complete
 
page 2

-------------------------------------------------------------------

The AVN’s President, Ms Dorey, in response to OLGR, claimed that these were the errors of
well-meaning volunteers, including her, with no qualifications or experience in finance. Yet
Ms Dorey claims to have been a ‘Wall St Stockbroker.’
1
0
 
No-one gets to be a Wall St Stockbroker without passing General Securities Representative
Exam, (commonly referred to as the Series 7 Exam), conducted by the USA Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the independent regulator of all securities firms
in the United States. This is an intensive course including finance, securitisation, banking,
accounting and auditing. If Ms Dorey was indeed a Wall St stockbroker, her claims of
innocent errors are blatant lies.
Inexplicably, your office decided that it was appropriate to reinstate the AVN’s CFA after
accepting her stories and receiving assurances of future good behaviour. Those
reassurances were completely worthless and she and the AVN have continued on their
merry way disregarding legislation and the norms of society. For examples:
2. – BREACHES OF THE ASSOCIATIONS INCORPORATION ACT:
I have found, without going to much effort, the following breaches:
S44 -Submission of reports and statements to AGM failure to submit financial statements to
AGM; 16 breaches attracting total fines of $8,800.
S45 - Lodgement of documents with Director-General: failure to lodge financial statements
and auditor's reports for that year; 16 breaches attracting fines of $8,800
S85 - Failure to provide information as required by the Director General of the Office of Fair
Trading; a fine of $6,600
total = $24,200, never levied.
10
 
I
n the Lismore Northern Star Weekend edition, September 18 2010, page 39, Meryl Dorey
“....describes her
career as a Wall Street broker that ended with the loss of her job in
the 1987 stock market crash.”
 
page 3

-------------------------------------------------------------------

3. – BREACH OF THE CRIMES ACT
I also found, without going to much effort, a breach of the Crimes Act S307B - furnishing of
false or misleading information and the production of false or misleading documents.
Penalty is imprisonment for 2 years, or a fine of $22,000 or both. No action taken.
4. - VILIFICATION OF MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC AND AN MP
Early in 2012, the AVN published on its website a long diatribe vilifying me and Dr Andrew
McDonald MP, Opposition spokesman on Health.
1
1
On 30 April 2012 I submitted a formal complaint to you about this. On 5 June 2012 I wrote
to you again and informed you that Ms Dorey had issued new emails and webpages vilifying
me, Prof Robert Booy, Prof Peter McIntyre, and grieving parents Toni and Dave McCaffery,
who I point out, had issued public appeals for Ms Dorey and the AVN to leave them alone.
Following that, both Dr McDonald and
I received death threats, in my case from a person who the NSW Police identified as on
parole for a very serious offence. In spite of my, and four of my friends’, formal requests to
the AVN’s Pubic Officer and then President to take down the page, it remains there inciting
violence and harassment.
Your response of 18 June 2012 (Ref. IM12/15770 & IM12/20747) demonstrates, in your
suggestion that I seek legal advice for defamation, that your advisers completely missed the
point. What I was trying to say was
‘these are not the activities of a genuine charity.’
 
5. - HARASSMENT OF A GRIEVING FAMILY
Baby Dana McCaffery died of whooping cough, (Pertussis) in early 2009. Within days Ms
Dorey rang Mr Paul Corben, Director of the Area Health Service, claimed that the death was
not caused by Pertussis, demanded details of the diagnostics used, and demanded Dana’s
medical records.
12
 Mr Corben later described Dorey’s callousness as ‘chilling.’ Dorey then
went on national television stating that ‘no ever dies of measles and Pertussis.’
13
 
Remember that Dorey has no qualifications or experience in any health-related field.
11
 http://nocompulsoryvaccination.com/2012/04/28/v-is-for-vendetta/
12
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kaWvEgd2Qs
13
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JchWYukK-Q
page 4

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Dana’s family publicly appealed to Ms Dorey and the AVN to leave them alone to grieve in
private,
1
4
 but the harassment never stopped. Dorey even posted her own anti-vaccination
information on Dana McCaffery's memorial website.
1
5
 Dorey has claimed that it is
acceptable to harass a grieving family.
16
 
1
7
 
Ms Dorey has disputed in the media the cause of Dana’s death, saying that it was
‘supposedly due to whooping cough.’ When challenged on national television, she lied
again, and when the interviewer presented with the documentary evidence lied yet again.
1
8
 
This harassment has continued to two days ago, 16 February 2014. That morning Ms Dorey
posted the following on the AVN’s Facebook page. It is commentary on Dana’s death, and
included a newspaper clipping dated 21 April 2009, a few weeks after her death. It includes
the usual untrue anti-vaccine comments from Ms Dorey’s acolytes.



http://htmlimg2.scribdassets.com/4ffxkas7nk3onsea/images/6-e9d043aa20.jpg

The clipping is reproduced at Appendix 1, page 11.
Such behaviour is just plain evil, and continued after the AVN’s assurances to OLGR to
behave. All done with the imprimatur of a Charitable Fundraising Authority issued by your
department.
14
 http://scepticsbook.com/2009/06/18/toni-mccaffery-has-had-enough/
15
 http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/grieving-mother-toni-mccaffery-was-vilified-by-anti-vaccination-
bullies/story-e6frg6n6-1226650600820
16
 http://reasonablehank.com/2012/07/22/meryl-dorey-now-states-that-contacting-grieving-families-is-
appropriate/
17
 http://reasonablehank.com/2011/10/23/at-the-avn-it-is-acceptable-to-harass-a-grieving-family/
18
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kaWvEgd2Qs
page 5
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------

5. - THE AVN’S INCOME.
I and others have obtained the AVN’s Annual Financial Statements until 2011 and audited
them. We found that from 2004 to 2011, the AVN’s income was $1,992,020.
1
9
 
(The AVN’s
financial statements for 2012 and 2013 have not been submitted.) Not one cent of that was
spent on charitable activities, unless one counts harassing grieving families, publishing
incorrect information about vaccines and vilifying members of the public and MPs as
‘charitable.’
6. - REFUSAL TO DONATE TO AN APPEAL FOR A ‘VACCINE-INJURED’ CHILD’
In February 2014, the AVN received an appeal from a mother of a ‘vaccine – injured’ child,
Izzy Olesen, to help fund a sensory garden.
2
0
 
2
1
 (Izzy is blind and suffers from Stevens-
Johnson Syndrome.) The AVN, through Ms Dorey, replied as follows on the AVN’s website
2
2
 
:



http://htmlimg3.scribdassets.com/4ffxkas7nk3onsea/images/7-1fcf04a5be.jpg

Note the ‘The AVN is a charity – we help people like Izzy every single day.’ Several people
then challenged the AVN to make a donation, (see Appendix 2 beginning at page 12), but a
few days later the above post was deleted. The AVN was then directly challenged by
surgeon Mr John Cunningham to make a donation of between $1,000 and $10,000, in which
case he would match it. See Appendix 3 at page 15, his email to AVN President Mr Beatty
and Public Officer Ms Dorey.
More challenges were made, but nothing was heard from the AVN on Izzy’s sensory garden.
Eventually Mr Cunningham, after receiving no response, gave up waiting and made a $1000
19
 http://www.dilutedthinking.com/avn_finstat.php
20
 http://nocompulsoryvaccination.com/2014/02/05/vaccination-risks-predictable-or-a-game-of-chance/
21
 http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/help-build-izzy-a-safe-sensory-play-space
22
 http://nocompulsoryvaccination.com/
page 6


-------------------------------------------------------------------

donation on 13 February 2014. An appeal largely led by our Facebook group ‘Stop the
Australian (anti-) Vaccination Network’ SAVN, reached the $10,000 target that night.
To date, the AVN has donated nothing.
This ‘charity’ raised $1,992,020 over the previous eight years but can't donate anything to
help a disabled child? Yet, Ms Dorey had no trouble raising $11,187.50 overnight to pay her
legal costs
2
3
 when she lost her (vexatious) case,
2
4
 
so we know that the money is there.
9. – BREACHES OF CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING ACT S47 AND REGULATION 13.
At Appendix 4, beginning at page 17, you will find correspondence between you, your
department and Dr Anne Coady, who has submitted requests pursuant to the Act and
Regulation for information from the AVN and Ms Dorey. You will see that Ms Dorey and the
AVN have refused to comply, that Dr Coady has complained to you of this breach of the Act
and Regulation, and that your department has failed to act. At the very least Dr Coady’s
complaint should have led to an audit, but it did not.
Part of the reason for that failure, and only part, was Ms Dorey’s claims that she is being
subjected to harassment. Your department accepted Dorey’s allegations without any
checking or request for substantiation.
Your office should have known that this is Standard Operating Procedure for Ms Dorey; to
allege harassment and threats of violence whenever she is being asked to conform to the
law.
Your office should know that when her allegations have been put to the test in Court, they
have been rejected. Indeed, in the case of Dorey vs. Buzzard,
2
5
Ms Dorey has made this allegation many times in order to avoid scrutiny, and always the
government departments have accepted the allegations without quibble. As Dr Coady says
in her correspondence she is deeply affronted that your department would accept those
outrageous allegations so.
her allegations were thrown
out and costs were awarded against her. Remember that in civil cases such as this, the
decision is based on ‘the balance of probabilities,’ a very low bar, not ‘beyond reasonable
doubt.’
Dr Coady is not the only one to make this complaint. Your files will show that I and many
others have made the same complaints, and in all cases since the AVN’s Charitable
Fundraising Authority was restored, your department has failed to act.
23
 Email 27 August 2013.
24
 http://www.danbuzzard.net/storage/AVO-costs-letter.pdf
25
 http://www.danbuzzard.net/storage/AVO-costs-letter.pdf
page 7

-------------------------------------------------------------------

8. – AVN DEFIES TGA ORDERS
On 16 August 2012 The AVN and Ms Dorey were found by the TGA
2
6
 to have promoted the
dangerous alternative medicine known as ‘Black Salve’ for treating cancer. The TGA ordered
the AVN to withdraw representations, withdraw the advertisement, and publish a
retraction. The AVN refused to comply, and so on 16 May 2013 the TGA issued a
’Regulation 9 Order to Comply.’
2
7
 
Again, the AVN has refused to comply.
On 20 September 2009, the TGA again found
28
 that on another occasion Ms Dorey had
promoted ‘Black Salve’ to treat cancer.
29
 
Again, the TGA ordered Ms Dorey to withdraw
representations, withdraw the advertisement, and publish a retraction. Again, Ms Dorey
refused to comply.
On 15 November 2012 the TGA found
3
0
 
that the AVN’s magazine ‘Living Wisdom’ had
published misleading advertisements for ‘Total Care’ and ‘Bio-Chelat’ and ‘DentaCare
Mouthwash.’ Again the TGA ordered the AVN to withdraw representations, withdraw the
advertisement, and publish a retraction. Again, the AVN refused to comply.
Defying orders from a government regulator and promoting life-threatening potions is not
the activity of any charity. If for no other reason, this should be sufficient reason to have
the AVN’s Charitable Fundraising Authority cancelled.
9. THE LEGAL DEFINITION OF CHARITY
As you are no doubt aware, the definition of a ‘charity’ was recently changed by the
Charities Act
2013 No. 100, (Commonwealth).
The AVN does not meet the Public Benefit requirements of the Act.
'S
6 Purposes for the public benefit
(1) A purpose that an entity has is for the
 public benefit
 if:
(a) the achievement of the purpose would be of public benefit; and
26
 http://www.tgacrp.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=13&special=complaint_single&complaintID=2081
27
 http://www.tga.gov.au/industry/advertising-reg9-2012-04-022-black-salve.htm
28
 
28
 http://www.tgacrp.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=13&special=complaint_single&complaintID=2081
29
 http://www.tgacrp.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=13&special=complaint_single&complaintID=2114
30
 http://www.tgacrp.com.au/index.cfm?pageID=13&special=complaint_single&complaintID=2168
page 8

-------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) the purpose is directed to a benefit that is available to the members of:
(i) the general public; or
(ii) a sufficient section of the general public.'
The AVN is directly disqualified by the Act.
S11
'Disqualifying purpose
 In this Act:
 disqualifying purpose
 means:
(a) the purpose of engaging in, or promoting, activities that are
unlawful or contrary to public policy;'
SUMMARY:
- The AVN
engages in behaviours that in no way can be described as charitable.
Indeed some are just plain evil.
- These behaviours continued after the AVN’s CFA was restored, a condition of that
restoration being that the AVN would behave.
- The AVN has never committed a charitable act.
- The AVN has breached several Acts, including the Associations Incorporation Act,
the Charitable Fundraising Act, the Charitable Trusts Act, the Therapeutic Goods Act,
and direct orders from the TGA.
- The AVN’s allegations of harassment were baseless and should never have been
accepted; they were made to avoid scrutiny.
- Over the decades, the AVN has raised many millions of dollars, none of that spent
on any charitable activity. None of its Annual Financial Statements record any
charitable donations to any beneficiary.
- When challenged to perform a charitable act for a disabled child, whose parents
claim was disabled by a vaccine, the AVN refused to respond.
page 9

-------------------------------------------------------------------

- The AVN does not meet the new legal definition of a ‘charity.’
Minister, I repeat; there is grave disquiet in the medical community about the AVN’s
activities while holding a Charitable Fundraising Authority. We urge you to order that it not
be renewed.
Ken McLeod
Stop the Australian (anti-) Vaccination Network.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/quote*]


Previous post damaged. Please delete.
Logged
MASS MURDERERS:

Responsible for more than 83 dead: Taylor Winterstein, Edwin Tamasese


http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=11338.msg27786#msg27786

worelia

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 536
Re: Meryl Dorey takes part in lethal acid attack
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2015, 10:00:25 PM »

Let's give this some more thrust!


http://www.health.qld.gov.au/news-alerts/news/150107-anti-vacc-response.asp

[*quote*]
Queensland Government
Queensland Health

Queensland Health's response to anti-vaccination discussions
Wednesday 7 January 2015

Timely vaccinations can prevent serious and sometimes life-threatening diseases

by Dr Sonya Bennett

Queensland Health is not  involved in any capacity with the ‘Healthy Lifestyles Naturally’ seminars soon to be conducted in Queensland and does not in any way support anti-vaccination sentiments.

It is ironic that the seminars are called ‘Healthy Lifestyles Naturally’ as anti-vaccination discussions threaten the health of the community.

Vaccine preventable diseases such as whooping cough, measles, meningococcal disease and rotavirus are serious and sometimes life-threatening infections. Homeopathic products do not provide protection against these diseases.

We seek to minimise misinformation preventing a person from making an informed  decision about immunisation.

In the interests of a healthy community, Queensland Health is conducting a  campaign to debunk these common myths about immunisation and remind people of the value and importance of vaccination.

Modern vaccination programs have been established after rigorous scientific studies to ensure the best possible health outcomes for individuals and the population as a whole.

Many anti-vaccination claims are based on poorly conducted studies that have been discredited or disproven, such as claims that vaccinations cause SIDS or autism. These claims are entirely baseless.

Governments and numerous expert bodies worldwide support immunisation because it prevents serious and life-threatening infectious diseases.

Questions on this topic are best directed to the experts, such as an immunisation provider or your family doctor, with whom you would discuss other health questions.

The fact is that if vaccination stopped, vaccine preventable diseases would inevitably return causing devastation for many families.

There is a range of information available online at www.qld.gov.au/vaccinate

Concerns about the seminars should be directed to the event organiser.


Last updated: 7 January 2015

© The State of Queensland (Queensland Health) 1996-2014

Queensland Government
[*/quote*]

Logged
MASS MURDERERS:

Responsible for more than 83 dead: Taylor Winterstein, Edwin Tamasese


http://www.transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=11338.msg27786#msg27786

Thymian

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2135
Re: Meryl Dorey takes part in lethal acid attack
« Reply #10 on: January 07, 2021, 10:46:28 AM »

Marke: 11.000
Logged
.         Im Angesicht von Gewalt ist Höflichkeit gegenstandslos.
.         At face with violence politeness is pointless.

.         (User TNT in the former CDU forum)
--------------------------------------- * --------------------------------------- * ---------------------------------------

RubyCat

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 391
Re: Meryl Dorey takes part in lethal acid attack
« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2022, 03:07:15 AM »

Marke: 12.000
Pages: [1]