TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1

Pages: [1]

Author Topic: LEONID SCHNEIDER BRAUCHT DRINGEND IHRE HILFE  (Read 1113 times)

Jannitsch

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
LEONID SCHNEIDER BRAUCHT DRINGEND IHRE HILFE
« on: January 03, 2018, 08:07:06 PM »

https://forbetterscience.com/support-my-work/

[ZITAT]
I will continue operating this science journalism site regardless if it generates no income or even costs money. Even the most aggressive lawyer’s threats and blackmail (here, here and here) are not likely to stop it.

Status 22.11.2017: there are currently THREE court trials running against my reporting in Germany, both by doctors involved into Macchiarini-related trachea transplants. All are financially ruinous, this is why I need your financial support, however small (ways to support, see below). The goal of these ruthless doctors is to silence my reporting about their deeds, and to cause a financial ruin to my family and a subsequent prison term for me. This is not an exaggeration.

    Heike and Throsten Walles, former partners of Macchiarini, issued a bizarre court injunction against me, for simple quoting from a book about their earlier trachea transplants. It ended with an “amicable agreement” in an appeal court in Bamberg, but the Würzburg court followed it up with a baseless threat to remind me that bankruptcy and prison awaits me if I continue Walles reporting (read here).
    Philipp Jungebluth, Macchiarini’s right-hand man, presented himself to a court in Berlin as an life-saving angel of innocence to trick the court into passing an injunction against me. While no appeal date with higher court is set against that, another injunction came from the same judge in Berlin, based on a false translation and misinformation Jungebluth served to court. Now Jungebluth declares to have had nothing at all to do with Macchiarini’s trachea transplants, which the judge found as credible as that Jungebluth used to save lives with those same transplants, for the previous injunction.  Both cases will have to be dealt in an appeal court, or maybe above.

Therefore, please donate, there is no minimum amount. Eurozone residents could wire directly to my German bank account so we both avoid any bank fees. For others, I made a Patreon site.

You can also offer me jobs or speaking gigs. You can buy my original cartoons, or order new ones. You (or your research institution) can also invite me as a paid conference speaker or student tutor, my main subjects are research integrity and academic publishing. I am also available as free-lance journalist for science-interested media.

As a private person, I cannot register as a charity, thus your donations are not tax-deductible. I will of course provide a proper receipt for my services as cartoonist or journalist, if you should engage them.

Please understand that your donations and work offers will not influence the topics and angles of my journalism.

If interested, please contact me here or go straight to my Patreon site. There is also this simple one-time donation option:

 

Donate!

If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Or several of small tips, just increase the amount as you like. Your generous patronage of my journalism, however small it appears to you, will greatly help me with my legal costs.

€5,00

If you can’t help financially, you can still promote my site and share its articles in your online and real-life social networks. And please, do alert main media journalists. This would be an excellent help as well.

Thank you all in advance.

Yours,

Leonid Schneider
[ENDE]
Logged

Julian

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 443
Re: LEONID SCHNEIDER BRAUCHT DRINGEND IHRE HILFE
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2018, 01:05:47 AM »

Kurzer Check:


https://forbetterscience.com/support-my-work/

[*quote*]
I will continue operating this science journalism site regardless if it generates no income or even costs money. Even the most aggressive lawyer’s threats and blackmail (here, here and here) are not likely to stop it.

Status 5.07.2018:

I was sentenced in the appeal court in Berlin, after the judges repeatedly lied during the hearing in order to deny me the right to a fair trial. They did however establish my status as immigrant in Germany and issued two hefty fines under threat of imprisonment, all on phony pretences. The total legal costs are horrendous (for me, but they are peanuts for a surgeon or a judge, a price of one fancy vacation), and the German press is now scared to even mention the name Philipp Jungebluth, or to suggest that the affair has any German connection. On May 24th 2018, press freedom and the right to a fair trial were abolished in Germany, on an example of one Jewish journalist, accused of and sentenced for: malicious ignorance of English language. This is what the entire court verdict is based on. The case is presented here.

I am now the only person in the entire world who was sentenced in a court of law for the deadly trachea transplants performed by Paolo Macchiarini, while his right hand man Jungebluth, a hero for his German medical colleagues, is not yet done suing me. His and Macchiarini’s main success was not just the revenge they had on me, but the silence they imposed on all press in Germany and beyond.  My family is under constant threat of financial ruin and a subsequent prison term for me. This is not an exaggeration.

Other court case I managed to get out of, only because newspapers and TV were present during the hearing:

    Heike and Throsten Walles, former partners of Macchiarini, issued a bizarre court injunction against me, for simple quoting from a book about their earlier trachea transplants. It ended with an “amicable agreement” in an appeal court in Bamberg, but the Würzburg court followed it up with a baseless threat to remind me that bankruptcy and prison awaits me if I continue Walles reporting (read here).

Therefore, please donate, there is no minimum amount. Eurozone residents could wire directly to my German bank account so we both avoid any bank fees. For others, I made a Patreon site.

You can also offer me jobs or speaking gigs. You can buy my original cartoons, or order new ones. You (or your research institution) can also invite me as a paid conference speaker or student tutor, my main subjects are research integrity and academic publishing. I am also available as free-lance journalist for science-interested media.

As a private person, I cannot register as a charity, thus your donations are not tax-deductible. I will of course provide a proper receipt for my services as cartoonist or journalist, if you should engage them.

Please understand that your donations and work offers will not influence the topics and angles of my journalism.

If interested, please contact me here or go straight to my Patreon site. There is also this simple one-time donation option:

 

 

Donate!

If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Or several of small tips, just increase the amount as you like. Your generous patronage of my journalism, however small it appears to you, will greatly help me with my legal costs.

€5,00

If you can’t help financially, you can still promote my site and share its articles in your online and real-life social networks. And please, do alert main media journalists. This would be an excellent help as well.

Thank you all in advance.

Yours,

Leonid Schneider
[*/quote*]
Logged
StarCruiser http://WWW.ALLAXYS.COM mission countdown

Julian

  • Boltbender
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 443
Re: LEONID SCHNEIDER BRAUCHT DRINGEND IHRE HILFE
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2018, 01:11:46 AM »

Detailcheck zum Prozeß:

Zitat:

[*quote*]
His legal insurance pays for him suing me in full, in fact the court spent yesterday lots of time debating how not to let me win the first injunction completely because then Jungebluth’s legal insurance might deny coverage and the good doctor might have to pay something from his own pocket. This discussion truly took place, I was listening incredulously. My own legal insurance refused paying long ago (already in Walles case), and my pleas to court I have no income and rely on donations to pay my court costs were shrugged off with a thinly veiled “this you should have thought about before writing your lies” attitude.
[*/quote*]

Das sind bekannte Methoden in Deutschland.


Quelle:

https://forbetterscience.com/2018/05/25/some-good-news-and-a-major-disaster-in-appeal-court-re-macchiarini-affair/

[*quote*]
 Leonid Schneider   in Lawyering-up, News   May 25, 2018 1,687 Words
No good news, instead a major disaster in appeal court re: Macchiarini affair

The German justice has spoken on trachea transplants again, in the appeal hearing at Kammergericht Berlin, and found the problem to lie with the journalists and press freedom. Good news first: I might have won the first injunction case against Philipp Jungebluth, or at least in large part, so I will probably get most of my money refunded there (Update 30.05.2018: the court tricked me and rejected my appeal on that injunction too. It remains valid to 1/3 just as before, see below). This only happened because the judges regarded how exactly Jungebluth left his job in Heidelberg being a minor enough issue (they did advice him to sue a Swedish newspaper for interviewing him about his sacking in Sweden (sic!)). This money I then will pay back to Paolo Macchiarini‘s acolyte and the court, and much, much more on top, because the three appeal court judges announced to uphold the second injunction in full. These are their oral arguments from yesterday summarised:

    My claim that Macchiarini’s and Jungebluth’s unpublished manuscript refers to 5 dead patients operated by Macchiarini in Italy is void, because I failed to present that manuscript. My objection that this would identify my source, protected by journalistic confidentiality, was dismissed as my own problem, even if Jungebluth never denied the correctness of all quotes from that manuscript. German press freedom was abolished at Kammergericht Berlin on May 24th 2018.
    Whatever a German doctor might have done abroad, can never tarnish his reputation in Germany. The court sternly berated myself and my lawyer for have bothered it with pointless and irrelevant stories of what Jungebluth did in Sweden. This is an interesting invitation for German doctors to go and have fun abroad, coming from the German Kammergericht in Berlin.
    There is no such thing as surgery training. Either one is a surgeon who operates a patient, or one is a student of medicine, never actively involved in any operations aside of watching (which was all Jungebluth says to have done). The only person required to have a medical licence at an operation is the surgeon alone, all those assisting do not need any medical certifications. This, and that there are no practice requirements for training surgeons, was decreed by Kammergericht Berlin on May 24th 2018.
    I was made responsible for the veracity of all works written by Jungebluth, in particular that unpublished manuscript he himself wrote. Making academic assumptions while citing Jungebluth’s own words that what he wrote might really have happened, constitutes “false factual claims” and thus punishable as libel.
    The injunction was originally passed without any explanation or justification whatsoever by a judge at Landesgericht. After the first hearing, that judge argued that the authors’ contribution statement “PJ assisted in clinical transplantations” does not mean Jungebluth assisted in the transplantation described in that manuscript, but in some other, unspecified and unrelated and likely imagined ones. This academically ridiculous argument (supported later by Prof Macchiarini himself in a sworn affidavit), will be now replaced with a new one, which the Kammergericht was not able to formulate coherently and announced to invent for the later verdict. Basically, the court’s desire to pass an injunction was uncoupled from the actual original legal argument on the reasons: sentence first, argue later. My defence attempts became a game of wake-a-mole, where each time I disproved one argument of the court, it either went to invent another one (including arguments of English grammar), or simply told me to shut up. This goes against a right to fair trial, which was abolished at Kammergericht Berlin on May 24th 2018.
    Macchiarini’s trachea transplants were all based on solid preclinical research, proved successful and beneficial to patients (at least initially) and received all necessary ethics approvals. I was educated about this being indisputable facts by the presiding judge. Per verdict of Berlin Kammergericht of May 2th 2018, Macchiarini and anyone associated with him can never be accused of patient abuse or unlawful activities.

I will update this post when the verdicts arrive. My legal expenses for the Jungebluth case alone are at the height of €30-40k, money which I don’t have, hence please donate. Jungebluth himself had to invest exactly NOTHING so far. His legal insurance pays for him suing me in full, in fact the court spent yesterday lots of time debating how not to let me win the first injunction completely because then Jungebluth’s legal insurance might deny coverage and the good doctor might have to pay something from his own pocket. This discussion truly took place, I was listening incredulously. My own legal insurance refused paying long ago (already in Walles case), and my pleas to court I have no income and rely on donations to pay my court costs were shrugged off with a thinly veiled “this you should have thought about before writing your lies” attitude.

However, if I back down now, after Jungebluth it might be Macchiarini himself suing me in Berlin, since Macchiarini is spoken of almost only positively in the gagged- and timid German media and, to make his court case in Germany, Professor Macchiarini has an ongoing academic affiliation with the Hannover Medical School.

Hence, please donate, on Patreon, or one-off donation below, or just contact me.

Those  court injunctions by Macchiarini’s past associates (Heike and Thorsten Walles, and of course Jungebluth here) take their toll, not just financially. Many scientists are afraid to invite me to give a research integrity seminar. Those court trials are also routinely used as excuse to dismiss my reporting and my evidence as a bunch of slanderous lies. The Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) in London, associated with UCL, performed 3 trachea transplants on children between 2010 and 2017 (at least one of those lethal). They now categorically distance themselves from Macchiarini (who performed the first of those operations)  in the following quoted submission to UK parliament, while taking sides with Macchiarini’s former partners suing me, especially with Jungebluth (since Walles injunction was lifted after settlement). On top, GOSH also conjures a vision of me, an ethnically Jewish immigrant from Ukraine, as a German Nazi. Actually, the accusations of racism and xenophobia were raised against UCL elite, not just by myself and media, but even determined in court (page 22 here). This is now the relevant excerpt from GOSH testimony from 7 April 2018 to UK parliament, primarily signed by past Macchiarini associates from GOSH and UCL professors Paolo De Coppi and Martin Elliott:

    “We thank you for the opportunity to clarify once more the position of the clinicians at Great Ormond Street Hospital involved in the care of the 3 patients transplanted with a tissue engineering trachea. Unfortunately, we noticed that the letter from MP reports reference to a malicious website (1) which has been addressing (with racist comments) the conclusions of extensive and deep investigations conducted by University College London.

    The internet blogging site (“For Better Science”) is written by a German man called Leonid Schneider. Leonid Schneider has been found guilty of libel against other researchers in German courts on several occasions. From April 2017, the site has run a blog covering the writer‘s personal views of various tissue engineered tracheal transplantations. The blogger uses few scientific peer reviewed references which makes it difficult properly to comment upon it.

    The circumstances and accusations have already been investigated in detail by a previous UCL initiated formal investigation. The UCL inquiry completely vindicated GOSH a fact which needs to be used as a starting point. Nevertheless, we have distanced ourselves from Macchiarini since 2010 and have since conducted 2 transplantations, without any involvement of Macchiarini or his team.”

For many reasons, I must continue defending myself in court, and on my “malicious” non-peer reviewed site against Jungebluth’s and Macchiarini’s attacks. I will try to bring my case to the Supreme Constitutional Court in Germany, or maybe even European Court of Justice, as basic constitutional rights were abolished in my case, to protect the interests of Macchiarini and his associates. This will cost, please donate. If you can help with pro bono legal advice, or with contacts to legal experts or journalists who care for truth and human rights, please do.

Update 30.05.2018. The court transcript have arrived. The court rejects my appeal on 2nd injunction entirely, I have to pay all costs: my lawyer, Jungebluth’s lawyer, all court costs. Regarding the 1st injunction: I was tricked by the court. The judges announced throughout the entire hearing to lift the injunction completely, but afterwards sneakily changed their mind. Possibly because I was exposed by the court as immigrant from Ukraine, and because Jungebluth expressed concern that his legal insurance might not cover his costs. My lawyer explained to me that my (futile)  attempt to defend myself against the second injunction led the court to develop an antipathy against my person, and hence change their verdict against me. Basically, the entire appeal was thrown out after only Jungebluth’s side was allowed to speak, I stand where I was before, with an enormous extra bill.

Update 18.05.2018. The court verdict has arrived, where my appeal is dismissed in its entirety. I am also ordered to pay a fine of €1000 plus court costs, for failing to predict and interfere with the Worpress algorithm which pops up related articles automatically.

The scariest bit: The judges tricked me, again. The final verdict follows exactly the argument of the previous court, which the judge said was wrong. I was instead accused of having made up the content of the manuscript, which in reality never described any Italian patients, and made to argue against that. That was a trick, because in the final verdict the court declares that:

“PJ assisted in clinical transplantations” doesn’t mean Jungebluth assisted in any of transplantations described in the manuscript, which the court now does say happened in Italy. Why so? If those were meant, the court writes in the verdict in German, using German translations, it would have said: “PJ assisted in the clinical transplantations“.

2 courts with 3 ethnically German judges each, whose entire knowledge of English language is school-derived, unable to pronounce the name “Macchiarini” correctly, sentenced a Russian native speaker for malicious and criminal ignorance of English grammar.

Please donate.

 

 

Donate!

If you are interested to support my work, you can leave here a small tip of $5. Or several of small tips, just increase the amount as you like. Your generous patronage of my journalism, however small it appears to you, will greatly help me with my legal costs.
[*/quote*]
Logged
StarCruiser http://WWW.ALLAXYS.COM mission countdown

Munterbunt

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 92

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31484-3/fulltext

[*quote*]
The Lancet

Volume 392, No. 10141, p2, 7 July 2018
Editorial

The final verdict on Paolo Macchiarini: guilty of misconduct

The Lancet
Published: 07 July 2018
PlumX Metrics

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31484-3 |

    Full Text
    Tables and Figures

In this issue, we are retracting two papers by Paolo Macchiarini and co-authors after receiving requests to do so from the new President of the Karolinska Institute (KI), Ole Petter Ottersen. In its final decision, the KI finds that the research reported in the 2011 Lancet paper and elements of a Review published in 2012 “constitutes scientific misconduct”. In his request for retraction, Ottersen states that ”no ethical permit had been obtained for the underlying research. The research was carried out without sufficient support by preclinical data, and the paper presents its data in a way that is unduly positive and uncritical. The clinical findings reported are not supported by source data.”

This final verdict comes after years of uncertainty and turmoil at the KI with differing pronouncements on misconduct, which eventually led The Lancet to issue an Expression of Concern for the research paper on April 2, 2016. This final KI investigation report follows the conclusion by the Central Ethical Review Board's expert group on Oct 2, 2017, that six papers, including the two Lancet papers, contained material constituting scientific misconduct and that all authors were guilty of misconduct. After giving all authors the opportunity to respond and examining each author's contribution, conduct, and responsibility in detail, the KI came to a different conclusion on the authors' culpability.

It divided author responsibility into three different categories: “responsible for misconduct”, “blameworthy or not beyond criticism”, and “not responsible for scientific misconduct and not blameworthy”. For the Lancet papers, Paolo Macchiarini, Philipp Jungebluth, Karl-Henrik Grinnemo, Jan Erik Juto, Alexander Seifalian, Tomas Gudbjartsson, and Katarina Le Blanc were found guilty of misconduct. This judgment was based on their intention to deceive at the time of publication, or their negligence in obtaining information or permits that were required. All other authors of the research paper—apart from Claire Crowley, who only became an author late in the process and was a student—were deemed blameworthy. The three co-authors of the Review paper were found not blameworthy and not guilty of misconduct. We welcome this thoughtful and clear conclusion of an extraordinary case.
[*/quote*]


Leider ersetzt das dem Leonid Schneider nicht die Kosten.

Helft Leonid Schneider! Spendet! https://forbetterscience.com/support-my-work/



https://forbetterscience.com/support-my-work/
Logged
Pages: [1]